Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catta, Davide, d'Aragona, Antonio Piccolomini
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17511
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917935551873024
author Catta, Davide
d'Aragona, Antonio Piccolomini
author_facet Catta, Davide
d'Aragona, Antonio Piccolomini
contents In this paper, we propose to connect Prawitz's theory of grounds with Girard's Ludics. This connection is carried out on two levels. On a more philosophical one, we highlight some differences between Prawitz's and Girard's approaches, but we also argue that they share some basic ideas about proofs and deduction. On a more formal one, we sketch an indicative translation of Prawitz's theory grounds into Girard's Ludics relative to the implicational fragment of propositional intuitionistic logic. This may allow for a dialogical reading of Prawitz's ground-theoretic approach. Moreover, it becomes possible to provide a formal definition of a notion of ground-candidate introduced by Cozzo.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_17511
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Game of grounds
Catta, Davide
d'Aragona, Antonio Piccolomini
Logic
In this paper, we propose to connect Prawitz's theory of grounds with Girard's Ludics. This connection is carried out on two levels. On a more philosophical one, we highlight some differences between Prawitz's and Girard's approaches, but we also argue that they share some basic ideas about proofs and deduction. On a more formal one, we sketch an indicative translation of Prawitz's theory grounds into Girard's Ludics relative to the implicational fragment of propositional intuitionistic logic. This may allow for a dialogical reading of Prawitz's ground-theoretic approach. Moreover, it becomes possible to provide a formal definition of a notion of ground-candidate introduced by Cozzo.
title Game of grounds
topic Logic
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17511