Choices Speak Louder than Questions

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Cho, Gyeongje, So, Yeonkyoung, Lee, Jaejin
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866912815605874688
author Cho, Gyeongje
So, Yeonkyoung
Lee, Jaejin
author_facet Cho, Gyeongje
So, Yeonkyoung
Lee, Jaejin
contents Recent findings raise concerns about whether the evaluation of Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) accurately reflects the comprehension abilities of large language models. This paper explores the concept of choice sensitivity, which refers to the tendency for model decisions to be more influenced by the answer options than by a genuine understanding of the question. We introduce a new scoring method called Normalized Probability Shift by the Question (NPSQ), designed to isolate the impact of the question itself and provide a more reliable assessment of comprehension. Through experiments involving various input formats, including cloze, symbols, and hybrid formats, we find that traditional scoring methods - such as those based on log-likelihood or its length-normalized variant - are vulnerable to superficial characteristics of the answer choices. In contrast, NPSQ remains stable even when modifications are made to the answer options.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_18798
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Choices Speak Louder than Questions
Cho, Gyeongje
So, Yeonkyoung
Lee, Jaejin
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Recent findings raise concerns about whether the evaluation of Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) accurately reflects the comprehension abilities of large language models. This paper explores the concept of choice sensitivity, which refers to the tendency for model decisions to be more influenced by the answer options than by a genuine understanding of the question. We introduce a new scoring method called Normalized Probability Shift by the Question (NPSQ), designed to isolate the impact of the question itself and provide a more reliable assessment of comprehension. Through experiments involving various input formats, including cloze, symbols, and hybrid formats, we find that traditional scoring methods - such as those based on log-likelihood or its length-normalized variant - are vulnerable to superficial characteristics of the answer choices. In contrast, NPSQ remains stable even when modifications are made to the answer options.
title Choices Speak Louder than Questions
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18798