Provocations from the Humanities for Generative AI Research
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866917197230637056 |
|---|---|
| author | Klein, Lauren Martin, Meredith Brock, André Antoniak, Maria Walsh, Melanie Johnson, Jessica Marie Tilton, Lauren Mimno, David |
| author_facet | Klein, Lauren Martin, Meredith Brock, André Antoniak, Maria Walsh, Melanie Johnson, Jessica Marie Tilton, Lauren Mimno, David |
| contents | The effects of generative AI are experienced by a broad range of constituencies, but the disciplinary inputs to its development have been surprisingly narrow. Here we present a set of provocations from humanities researchers -- currently underrepresented in AI development -- intended to inform its future applications and enrich ongoing conversations about its uses, impact, and harms. Drawing from relevant humanities scholarship, along with foundational work in critical data studies, we elaborate eight claims with broad applicability to generative AI research: 1) Models make words, but people make meaning; 2) Generative AI requires an expanded definition of culture; 3) Generative AI can never be representative; 4) Bigger models are not always better models; 5) Not all training data is equivalent; 6) Openness is not an easy fix; 7) Limited access to compute enables corporate capture; and 8) AI universalism creates narrow human subjects. We also provide a working definition of humanities research, summarize some of its most salient theories and methods, and apply these theories and methods to the current landscape of AI. We conclude with a discussion of the importance of resisting the extraction of humanities research by computer science and related fields. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_19190 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Provocations from the Humanities for Generative AI Research Klein, Lauren Martin, Meredith Brock, André Antoniak, Maria Walsh, Melanie Johnson, Jessica Marie Tilton, Lauren Mimno, David Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence I.2.0; K.4.0 The effects of generative AI are experienced by a broad range of constituencies, but the disciplinary inputs to its development have been surprisingly narrow. Here we present a set of provocations from humanities researchers -- currently underrepresented in AI development -- intended to inform its future applications and enrich ongoing conversations about its uses, impact, and harms. Drawing from relevant humanities scholarship, along with foundational work in critical data studies, we elaborate eight claims with broad applicability to generative AI research: 1) Models make words, but people make meaning; 2) Generative AI requires an expanded definition of culture; 3) Generative AI can never be representative; 4) Bigger models are not always better models; 5) Not all training data is equivalent; 6) Openness is not an easy fix; 7) Limited access to compute enables corporate capture; and 8) AI universalism creates narrow human subjects. We also provide a working definition of humanities research, summarize some of its most salient theories and methods, and apply these theories and methods to the current landscape of AI. We conclude with a discussion of the importance of resisting the extraction of humanities research by computer science and related fields. |
| title | Provocations from the Humanities for Generative AI Research |
| topic | Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence I.2.0; K.4.0 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19190 |