Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19285 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909640216805376 |
|---|---|
| author | Lucassen, Ruben T. van de Luijtgaarden, Tijn Moonemans, Sander P. J. Breimer, Gerben E. Blokx, Willeke A. M. Veta, Mitko |
| author_facet | Lucassen, Ruben T. van de Luijtgaarden, Tijn Moonemans, Sander P. J. Breimer, Gerben E. Blokx, Willeke A. M. Veta, Mitko |
| contents | Vision-language models in pathology enable multimodal case retrieval and automated report generation. Many of the models developed so far, however, have been trained on pathology reports that include information which cannot be inferred from paired whole slide images (e.g., patient history), potentially leading to hallucinated sentences in generated reports. To this end, we investigate how the selection of information from pathology reports for vision-language modeling affects the quality of the multimodal representations and generated reports. More concretely, we compare a model trained on full reports against a model trained on preprocessed reports that only include sentences describing the cell and tissue appearances based on the H&E-stained slides. For the experiments, we built upon the BLIP-2 framework and used a cutaneous melanocytic lesion dataset of 42,433 H&E-stained whole slide images and 19,636 corresponding pathology reports. Model performance was assessed using image-to-text and text-to-image retrieval, as well as qualitative evaluation of the generated reports by an expert pathologist. Our results demonstrate that text preprocessing prevents hallucination in report generation. Despite the improvement in the quality of the generated reports, training the vision-language model on full reports showed better cross-modal retrieval performance. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_19285 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | On the Importance of Text Preprocessing for Multimodal Representation Learning and Pathology Report Generation Lucassen, Ruben T. van de Luijtgaarden, Tijn Moonemans, Sander P. J. Breimer, Gerben E. Blokx, Willeke A. M. Veta, Mitko Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Vision-language models in pathology enable multimodal case retrieval and automated report generation. Many of the models developed so far, however, have been trained on pathology reports that include information which cannot be inferred from paired whole slide images (e.g., patient history), potentially leading to hallucinated sentences in generated reports. To this end, we investigate how the selection of information from pathology reports for vision-language modeling affects the quality of the multimodal representations and generated reports. More concretely, we compare a model trained on full reports against a model trained on preprocessed reports that only include sentences describing the cell and tissue appearances based on the H&E-stained slides. For the experiments, we built upon the BLIP-2 framework and used a cutaneous melanocytic lesion dataset of 42,433 H&E-stained whole slide images and 19,636 corresponding pathology reports. Model performance was assessed using image-to-text and text-to-image retrieval, as well as qualitative evaluation of the generated reports by an expert pathologist. Our results demonstrate that text preprocessing prevents hallucination in report generation. Despite the improvement in the quality of the generated reports, training the vision-language model on full reports showed better cross-modal retrieval performance. |
| title | On the Importance of Text Preprocessing for Multimodal Representation Learning and Pathology Report Generation |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19285 |