Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jwa, Seungyeob, Kim, Jeehun, Kim, Sunghee, Lee, Sunkyu, Lee, Weonjong, Park, Sungwoo
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00351
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912483865788416
author Jwa, Seungyeob
Kim, Jeehun
Kim, Sunghee
Lee, Sunkyu
Lee, Weonjong
Park, Sungwoo
author_facet Jwa, Seungyeob
Kim, Jeehun
Kim, Sunghee
Lee, Sunkyu
Lee, Weonjong
Park, Sungwoo
contents We present theoretical results for the indirect CP violation parameter, $ |\varepsilon_K| $, evaluated directly within the Standard Model using lattice QCD inputs including $ B_K $, $ |V_{cb}| $, $ |V_{us}| $, $ |V_{ud}| $, $ ξ_0 $, $ ξ_2 $, $ F_K $, and the charm quark mass $ m_c $. Our analysis reveals a significant tension at the $ \sim 5σ$ level ($ 4.6σ$ to $ 5.2σ$) between the Standard Model prediction and the experimental value of $ |\varepsilon_K| $. The Standard Model prediction, informed by lattice QCD inputs, accounts for only approximately 65% of the experimental value, leaving a 35% discrepancy unexplained. Notably, this tension vanishes when using the inclusive determination of $ |V_{cb}| $, derived from heavy quark expansion. The discrepancy is therefore tied to the well-known tension between the exclusive and inclusive determinations of $ |V_{cb}| $. We further report results for $ |\varepsilon_K| $ obtained using the Brod--Gorbahn--Stamou (BGS) method based on $ u\text{--}t $ unitarity, which yields an even stronger discrepancy, in the range of $ 4.9σ$ to $ 5.5σ$, when combined with lattice QCD inputs.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_00351
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle 2025 update on $\varepsilon_K$ in the Standard Model with lattice QCD inputs
Jwa, Seungyeob
Kim, Jeehun
Kim, Sunghee
Lee, Sunkyu
Lee, Weonjong
Park, Sungwoo
High Energy Physics - Lattice
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
We present theoretical results for the indirect CP violation parameter, $ |\varepsilon_K| $, evaluated directly within the Standard Model using lattice QCD inputs including $ B_K $, $ |V_{cb}| $, $ |V_{us}| $, $ |V_{ud}| $, $ ξ_0 $, $ ξ_2 $, $ F_K $, and the charm quark mass $ m_c $. Our analysis reveals a significant tension at the $ \sim 5σ$ level ($ 4.6σ$ to $ 5.2σ$) between the Standard Model prediction and the experimental value of $ |\varepsilon_K| $. The Standard Model prediction, informed by lattice QCD inputs, accounts for only approximately 65% of the experimental value, leaving a 35% discrepancy unexplained. Notably, this tension vanishes when using the inclusive determination of $ |V_{cb}| $, derived from heavy quark expansion. The discrepancy is therefore tied to the well-known tension between the exclusive and inclusive determinations of $ |V_{cb}| $. We further report results for $ |\varepsilon_K| $ obtained using the Brod--Gorbahn--Stamou (BGS) method based on $ u\text{--}t $ unitarity, which yields an even stronger discrepancy, in the range of $ 4.9σ$ to $ 5.5σ$, when combined with lattice QCD inputs.
title 2025 update on $\varepsilon_K$ in the Standard Model with lattice QCD inputs
topic High Energy Physics - Lattice
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00351