Causal Inference on Outcomes Learned from Text

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Modarressi, Iman, Spiess, Jann, Venugopal, Amar
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915178822500352
author Modarressi, Iman
Spiess, Jann
Venugopal, Amar
author_facet Modarressi, Iman
Spiess, Jann
Venugopal, Amar
contents We propose a machine-learning tool that yields causal inference on text in randomized trials. Based on a simple econometric framework in which text may capture outcomes of interest, our procedure addresses three questions: First, is the text affected by the treatment? Second, which outcomes is the effect on? And third, how complete is our description of causal effects? To answer all three questions, our approach uses large language models (LLMs) that suggest systematic differences across two groups of text documents and then provides valid inference based on costly validation. Specifically, we highlight the need for sample splitting to allow for statistical validation of LLM outputs, as well as the need for human labeling to validate substantive claims about how documents differ across groups. We illustrate the tool in a proof-of-concept application using abstracts of academic manuscripts.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_00725
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Causal Inference on Outcomes Learned from Text
Modarressi, Iman
Spiess, Jann
Venugopal, Amar
Econometrics
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
Methodology
We propose a machine-learning tool that yields causal inference on text in randomized trials. Based on a simple econometric framework in which text may capture outcomes of interest, our procedure addresses three questions: First, is the text affected by the treatment? Second, which outcomes is the effect on? And third, how complete is our description of causal effects? To answer all three questions, our approach uses large language models (LLMs) that suggest systematic differences across two groups of text documents and then provides valid inference based on costly validation. Specifically, we highlight the need for sample splitting to allow for statistical validation of LLM outputs, as well as the need for human labeling to validate substantive claims about how documents differ across groups. We illustrate the tool in a proof-of-concept application using abstracts of academic manuscripts.
title Causal Inference on Outcomes Learned from Text
topic Econometrics
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00725