Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Do, Tuan Q., Kao, W. F.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03776
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910859876368384
author Do, Tuan Q.
Kao, W. F.
author_facet Do, Tuan Q.
Kao, W. F.
contents Inspired by the five-dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory, we would like to study the dimensional reduction issue of six-dimensional Kaluza-Klein extension in this paper. In particular, we will examine two possible approaches of dimensional reduction from six-dimensional spacetimes to four-dimensional ones. The first one is a direct dimensional reduction, i.e., from six-dimensional spacetimes directly to four-dimensional ones, via a $T^2\equiv S^1 \times S^1$ compactification, while the second one is an indirect dimensional reduction, i.e., from six-dimensional spacetimes to five-dimensional ones then four-dimensional ones, via two separated $S^1$ compactifications. Interestingly, we show that these two approaches lead to different four-dimensional effective actions although using the same six-dimensional metric. It could therefore address an important question of which approach is more reliable than the other.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_03776
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle A gap between two approaches of dimensional reduction for a six-dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory
Do, Tuan Q.
Kao, W. F.
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Inspired by the five-dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory, we would like to study the dimensional reduction issue of six-dimensional Kaluza-Klein extension in this paper. In particular, we will examine two possible approaches of dimensional reduction from six-dimensional spacetimes to four-dimensional ones. The first one is a direct dimensional reduction, i.e., from six-dimensional spacetimes directly to four-dimensional ones, via a $T^2\equiv S^1 \times S^1$ compactification, while the second one is an indirect dimensional reduction, i.e., from six-dimensional spacetimes to five-dimensional ones then four-dimensional ones, via two separated $S^1$ compactifications. Interestingly, we show that these two approaches lead to different four-dimensional effective actions although using the same six-dimensional metric. It could therefore address an important question of which approach is more reliable than the other.
title A gap between two approaches of dimensional reduction for a six-dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory
topic General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03776