Polynomial Bounds in the Apex Minor Theorem
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915184129343488 |
|---|---|
| author | Hendrey, Kevin Wood, David R. |
| author_facet | Hendrey, Kevin Wood, David R. |
| contents | A graph $A$ is "apex" if $A-z$ is planar for some vertex $z\in V(A)$. Eppstein [Algorithmica, 2000] showed that for a minor-closed class $\mathcal{G}$, the graphs in $\mathcal{G}$ with bounded radius have bounded treewidth if and only if some apex graph is not in $\mathcal{G}$. In particular, for every apex graph $A$ and integer $r$, there is a minimum integer $g(A,r)$ such that every $A$-minor-free graph with radius $r$ has treewidth at most $g(A,r)$. We show that if $t=|V(A)|$ then $g(A,r)\in O^\ast(r^9t^{18})$ which is the first upper bound on $g(A,r)$ with polynomial dependence on both $r$ and $t$. More precisely, we show that every $A$-minor-free graph with radius $r$ has no $16rt^2 \times 16rt^2$ grid minor, which implies the first result via the Polynomial Grid Minor Theorem. A key example of an apex graph is the complete bipartite graph $K_{3,t}$, since $K_{3,t}$-minor-free graphs include and generalise graphs embeddable in any fixed surface. In this case, we prove that every $K_{3,t}$-minor-free graph with radius $r$ has no $4r(1+\sqrt{t})\times 4r(1+\sqrt{t})$ grid minor, which is tight up to a constant factor. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_04228 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Polynomial Bounds in the Apex Minor Theorem Hendrey, Kevin Wood, David R. Combinatorics Discrete Mathematics A graph $A$ is "apex" if $A-z$ is planar for some vertex $z\in V(A)$. Eppstein [Algorithmica, 2000] showed that for a minor-closed class $\mathcal{G}$, the graphs in $\mathcal{G}$ with bounded radius have bounded treewidth if and only if some apex graph is not in $\mathcal{G}$. In particular, for every apex graph $A$ and integer $r$, there is a minimum integer $g(A,r)$ such that every $A$-minor-free graph with radius $r$ has treewidth at most $g(A,r)$. We show that if $t=|V(A)|$ then $g(A,r)\in O^\ast(r^9t^{18})$ which is the first upper bound on $g(A,r)$ with polynomial dependence on both $r$ and $t$. More precisely, we show that every $A$-minor-free graph with radius $r$ has no $16rt^2 \times 16rt^2$ grid minor, which implies the first result via the Polynomial Grid Minor Theorem. A key example of an apex graph is the complete bipartite graph $K_{3,t}$, since $K_{3,t}$-minor-free graphs include and generalise graphs embeddable in any fixed surface. In this case, we prove that every $K_{3,t}$-minor-free graph with radius $r$ has no $4r(1+\sqrt{t})\times 4r(1+\sqrt{t})$ grid minor, which is tight up to a constant factor. |
| title | Polynomial Bounds in the Apex Minor Theorem |
| topic | Combinatorics Discrete Mathematics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04228 |