Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vorderwülbeke, Emily, Graßl, Isabella
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04576
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912262770393088
author Vorderwülbeke, Emily
Graßl, Isabella
author_facet Vorderwülbeke, Emily
Graßl, Isabella
contents Queer students often encounter discrimination and a lack of belonging in their academic environments. This may be especially true in heteronormative male-dominated fields like software engineering, which already faces a diversity crisis. In contrast, disciplines like humanities have a higher proportion of queer students, suggesting a more diverse academic culture. While prior research has explored queer students' challenges in STEM fields, limited attention has been given to how experiences differ between the sociotechnical, yet highly heteronormative, field of software engineering and the socioculturally inclusive humanities. This study addresses that gap by comparing 165 queer software engineering and 119 queer humanities students experiences. Our findings reveal that queer students in software engineering are less likely to be open about their sexuality, report a significantly lower sense of belonging, and encounter more academic challenges compared to their peers in the humanities. Despite these challenges, queer software engineering students show greater determination to continue their studies. These insights suggest that software engineering could enhance inclusivity by adopting practices commonly seen in the humanities, such as integrating inclusive policies in classrooms, to create a more welcoming environment where queer students can thrive.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_04576
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Belonging Beyond Code: Queer Software Engineering and Humanities Student Experiences
Vorderwülbeke, Emily
Graßl, Isabella
Software Engineering
Queer students often encounter discrimination and a lack of belonging in their academic environments. This may be especially true in heteronormative male-dominated fields like software engineering, which already faces a diversity crisis. In contrast, disciplines like humanities have a higher proportion of queer students, suggesting a more diverse academic culture. While prior research has explored queer students' challenges in STEM fields, limited attention has been given to how experiences differ between the sociotechnical, yet highly heteronormative, field of software engineering and the socioculturally inclusive humanities. This study addresses that gap by comparing 165 queer software engineering and 119 queer humanities students experiences. Our findings reveal that queer students in software engineering are less likely to be open about their sexuality, report a significantly lower sense of belonging, and encounter more academic challenges compared to their peers in the humanities. Despite these challenges, queer software engineering students show greater determination to continue their studies. These insights suggest that software engineering could enhance inclusivity by adopting practices commonly seen in the humanities, such as integrating inclusive policies in classrooms, to create a more welcoming environment where queer students can thrive.
title Belonging Beyond Code: Queer Software Engineering and Humanities Student Experiences
topic Software Engineering
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04576