Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lassota, Alexandra, Ligthart, Koen
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05548
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911215596339200
author Lassota, Alexandra
Ligthart, Koen
author_facet Lassota, Alexandra
Ligthart, Koen
contents We study integer linear programs (ILP) of the form $\min\{c^\top x\ \vert\ Ax=b,l\le x\le u,x\in\mathbb Z^n\}$ and analyze their parameterized complexity with respect to their distance to the generalized matching problem, following the well-established approach of capturing the hardness of a problem by the distance to triviality. The generalized matching problem is an ILP where each column of the constraint matrix has a $1$-norm of at most $2$. It captures several well-known polynomial time solvable problems such as matching and flow problems. We parameterize by the size of variable and constraint backdoors, which measure the least number of columns or rows that must be deleted to obtain a generalized matching ILP. We present the following results: (i) a fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm for ILPs parameterized by the size $p$ of a minimum variable backdoor to generalized matching; (ii) a randomized slice-wise polynomial (XP) time algorithm for ILPs parameterized by the size $p+h$ of a mixed variable plus constraint backdoor to generalized matching as long as $c$ and $A$ are encoded in unary; (iii) we complement (ii) by proving that solving ILPs is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the size of a minimum constraint backdoor $h$ even when all coefficients are bounded. To obtain (i), we prove a variant of lattice-convexity of the degree sequences of weighted $b$-matchings, which we study in the light of SBO jump M-convex functions. This allows us to model the matching part as a polyhedral constraint on the integer backdoor variables. The resulting ILP is solved using an FPT integer programming algorithm. For (ii), the randomized XP time algorithm is obtained by pseudo-polynomially reducing the problem to the exact matching problem. To prevent an exponential blowup in terms of the encoding length of $b$, we bound the proximity of the ILP through a subdeterminant based circuit bound.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_05548
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Parameterized Algorithms for Matching Integer Programs with Additional Rows and Columns
Lassota, Alexandra
Ligthart, Koen
Computational Complexity
We study integer linear programs (ILP) of the form $\min\{c^\top x\ \vert\ Ax=b,l\le x\le u,x\in\mathbb Z^n\}$ and analyze their parameterized complexity with respect to their distance to the generalized matching problem, following the well-established approach of capturing the hardness of a problem by the distance to triviality. The generalized matching problem is an ILP where each column of the constraint matrix has a $1$-norm of at most $2$. It captures several well-known polynomial time solvable problems such as matching and flow problems. We parameterize by the size of variable and constraint backdoors, which measure the least number of columns or rows that must be deleted to obtain a generalized matching ILP. We present the following results: (i) a fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm for ILPs parameterized by the size $p$ of a minimum variable backdoor to generalized matching; (ii) a randomized slice-wise polynomial (XP) time algorithm for ILPs parameterized by the size $p+h$ of a mixed variable plus constraint backdoor to generalized matching as long as $c$ and $A$ are encoded in unary; (iii) we complement (ii) by proving that solving ILPs is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the size of a minimum constraint backdoor $h$ even when all coefficients are bounded. To obtain (i), we prove a variant of lattice-convexity of the degree sequences of weighted $b$-matchings, which we study in the light of SBO jump M-convex functions. This allows us to model the matching part as a polyhedral constraint on the integer backdoor variables. The resulting ILP is solved using an FPT integer programming algorithm. For (ii), the randomized XP time algorithm is obtained by pseudo-polynomially reducing the problem to the exact matching problem. To prevent an exponential blowup in terms of the encoding length of $b$, we bound the proximity of the ILP through a subdeterminant based circuit bound.
title Parameterized Algorithms for Matching Integer Programs with Additional Rows and Columns
topic Computational Complexity
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05548