That is Unacceptable: the Moral Foundations of Canceling

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lo, Soda Marem, Araque, Oscar, Sharma, Rajesh, Stranisci, Marco Antonio
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866918275986751488
author Lo, Soda Marem
Araque, Oscar
Sharma, Rajesh
Stranisci, Marco Antonio
author_facet Lo, Soda Marem
Araque, Oscar
Sharma, Rajesh
Stranisci, Marco Antonio
contents Canceling is a morally-driven phenomenon that hinders the development of safe social media platforms and contributes to ideological polarization. To address this issue we present the Canceling Attitudes Detection (CADE) dataset, an annotated corpus of canceling incidents aimed at exploring the factors of disagreements in evaluating people canceling attitudes on social media. Specifically, we study the impact of annotators' morality in their perception of canceling, showing that morality is an independent axis for the explanation of disagreement on this phenomenon. Annotator's judgments heavily depend on the type of controversial events and involved celebrities. This shows the need to develop more event-centric datasets to better understand how harms are perpetrated in social media and to develop more aware technologies for their detection.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_05720
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle That is Unacceptable: the Moral Foundations of Canceling
Lo, Soda Marem
Araque, Oscar
Sharma, Rajesh
Stranisci, Marco Antonio
Computers and Society
Computation and Language
Canceling is a morally-driven phenomenon that hinders the development of safe social media platforms and contributes to ideological polarization. To address this issue we present the Canceling Attitudes Detection (CADE) dataset, an annotated corpus of canceling incidents aimed at exploring the factors of disagreements in evaluating people canceling attitudes on social media. Specifically, we study the impact of annotators' morality in their perception of canceling, showing that morality is an independent axis for the explanation of disagreement on this phenomenon. Annotator's judgments heavily depend on the type of controversial events and involved celebrities. This shows the need to develop more event-centric datasets to better understand how harms are perpetrated in social media and to develop more aware technologies for their detection.
title That is Unacceptable: the Moral Foundations of Canceling
topic Computers and Society
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05720