Political Neutrality in AI Is Impossible- But Here Is How to Approximate It

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Fisher, Jillian, Appel, Ruth E., Park, Chan Young, Potter, Yujin, Jiang, Liwei, Sorensen, Taylor, Feng, Shangbin, Tsvetkov, Yulia, Roberts, Margaret E., Pan, Jennifer, Song, Dawn, Choi, Yejin
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866916773601738752
author Fisher, Jillian
Appel, Ruth E.
Park, Chan Young
Potter, Yujin
Jiang, Liwei
Sorensen, Taylor
Feng, Shangbin
Tsvetkov, Yulia
Roberts, Margaret E.
Pan, Jennifer
Song, Dawn
Choi, Yejin
author_facet Fisher, Jillian
Appel, Ruth E.
Park, Chan Young
Potter, Yujin
Jiang, Liwei
Sorensen, Taylor
Feng, Shangbin
Tsvetkov, Yulia
Roberts, Margaret E.
Pan, Jennifer
Song, Dawn
Choi, Yejin
contents AI systems often exhibit political bias, influencing users' opinions and decisions. While political neutrality-defined as the absence of bias-is often seen as an ideal solution for fairness and safety, this position paper argues that true political neutrality is neither feasible nor universally desirable due to its subjective nature and the biases inherent in AI training data, algorithms, and user interactions. However, inspired by Joseph Raz's philosophical insight that "neutrality [...] can be a matter of degree" (Raz, 1986), we argue that striving for some neutrality remains essential for promoting balanced AI interactions and mitigating user manipulation. Therefore, we use the term "approximation" of political neutrality to shift the focus from unattainable absolutes to achievable, practical proxies. We propose eight techniques for approximating neutrality across three levels of conceptualizing AI, examining their trade-offs and implementation strategies. In addition, we explore two concrete applications of these approximations to illustrate their practicality. Finally, we assess our framework on current large language models (LLMs) at the output level, providing a demonstration of how it can be evaluated. This work seeks to advance nuanced discussions of political neutrality in AI and promote the development of responsible, aligned language models.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_05728
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Political Neutrality in AI Is Impossible- But Here Is How to Approximate It
Fisher, Jillian
Appel, Ruth E.
Park, Chan Young
Potter, Yujin
Jiang, Liwei
Sorensen, Taylor
Feng, Shangbin
Tsvetkov, Yulia
Roberts, Margaret E.
Pan, Jennifer
Song, Dawn
Choi, Yejin
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
AI systems often exhibit political bias, influencing users' opinions and decisions. While political neutrality-defined as the absence of bias-is often seen as an ideal solution for fairness and safety, this position paper argues that true political neutrality is neither feasible nor universally desirable due to its subjective nature and the biases inherent in AI training data, algorithms, and user interactions. However, inspired by Joseph Raz's philosophical insight that "neutrality [...] can be a matter of degree" (Raz, 1986), we argue that striving for some neutrality remains essential for promoting balanced AI interactions and mitigating user manipulation. Therefore, we use the term "approximation" of political neutrality to shift the focus from unattainable absolutes to achievable, practical proxies. We propose eight techniques for approximating neutrality across three levels of conceptualizing AI, examining their trade-offs and implementation strategies. In addition, we explore two concrete applications of these approximations to illustrate their practicality. Finally, we assess our framework on current large language models (LLMs) at the output level, providing a demonstration of how it can be evaluated. This work seeks to advance nuanced discussions of political neutrality in AI and promote the development of responsible, aligned language models.
title Political Neutrality in AI Is Impossible- But Here Is How to Approximate It
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05728