Should VLMs be Pre-trained with Image Data?

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keh, Sedrick, Mercat, Jean, Gadre, Samir Yitzhak, Arora, Kushal, Vasiljevic, Igor, Burchfiel, Benjamin, Song, Shuran, Tedrake, Russ, Kollar, Thomas, Schmidt, Ludwig, Dave, Achal
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866909532824797184
author Keh, Sedrick
Mercat, Jean
Gadre, Samir Yitzhak
Arora, Kushal
Vasiljevic, Igor
Burchfiel, Benjamin
Song, Shuran
Tedrake, Russ
Kollar, Thomas
Schmidt, Ludwig
Dave, Achal
author_facet Keh, Sedrick
Mercat, Jean
Gadre, Samir Yitzhak
Arora, Kushal
Vasiljevic, Igor
Burchfiel, Benjamin
Song, Shuran
Tedrake, Russ
Kollar, Thomas
Schmidt, Ludwig
Dave, Achal
contents Pre-trained LLMs that are further trained with image data perform well on vision-language tasks. While adding images during a second training phase effectively unlocks this capability, it is unclear how much of a gain or loss this two-step pipeline gives over VLMs which integrate images earlier into the training process. To investigate this, we train models spanning various datasets, scales, image-text ratios, and amount of pre-training done before introducing vision tokens. We then fine-tune these models and evaluate their downstream performance on a suite of vision-language and text-only tasks. We find that pre-training with a mixture of image and text data allows models to perform better on vision-language tasks while maintaining strong performance on text-only evaluations. On an average of 6 diverse tasks, we find that for a 1B model, introducing visual tokens 80% of the way through pre-training results in a 2% average improvement over introducing visual tokens to a fully pre-trained model.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_07603
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Should VLMs be Pre-trained with Image Data?
Keh, Sedrick
Mercat, Jean
Gadre, Samir Yitzhak
Arora, Kushal
Vasiljevic, Igor
Burchfiel, Benjamin
Song, Shuran
Tedrake, Russ
Kollar, Thomas
Schmidt, Ludwig
Dave, Achal
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Pre-trained LLMs that are further trained with image data perform well on vision-language tasks. While adding images during a second training phase effectively unlocks this capability, it is unclear how much of a gain or loss this two-step pipeline gives over VLMs which integrate images earlier into the training process. To investigate this, we train models spanning various datasets, scales, image-text ratios, and amount of pre-training done before introducing vision tokens. We then fine-tune these models and evaluate their downstream performance on a suite of vision-language and text-only tasks. We find that pre-training with a mixture of image and text data allows models to perform better on vision-language tasks while maintaining strong performance on text-only evaluations. On an average of 6 diverse tasks, we find that for a 1B model, introducing visual tokens 80% of the way through pre-training results in a 2% average improvement over introducing visual tokens to a fully pre-trained model.
title Should VLMs be Pre-trained with Image Data?
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07603