Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Thuy, Nguyen, Dang, Nguyen, Hoang, Luong, Thuan, Dang, Long Hoang, Lai, Viet Dac
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07631
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866908472115724288
author Nguyen, Thuy
Nguyen, Dang
Nguyen, Hoang
Luong, Thuan
Dang, Long Hoang
Lai, Viet Dac
author_facet Nguyen, Thuy
Nguyen, Dang
Nguyen, Hoang
Luong, Thuan
Dang, Long Hoang
Lai, Viet Dac
contents We present a challenging benchmark for the Open WorLd VISual question answering (OWLViz) task. OWLViz presents concise, unambiguous queries that require integrating multiple capabilities, including visual understanding, web exploration, and specialized tool usage. While humans achieve 69.2% accuracy on these intuitive tasks, even state-of-the-art VLMs struggle, with the best model, Gemini 2.0, achieving only 26.6% accuracy. Current agentic VLMs, which rely on limited vision and vision-language models as tools, perform even worse. This performance gap reveals significant limitations in multimodal systems' ability to select appropriate tools and execute complex reasoning sequences, establishing new directions for advancing practical AI research.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_07631
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle OWLViz: An Open-World Benchmark for Visual Question Answering
Nguyen, Thuy
Nguyen, Dang
Nguyen, Hoang
Luong, Thuan
Dang, Long Hoang
Lai, Viet Dac
Machine Learning
Computation and Language
We present a challenging benchmark for the Open WorLd VISual question answering (OWLViz) task. OWLViz presents concise, unambiguous queries that require integrating multiple capabilities, including visual understanding, web exploration, and specialized tool usage. While humans achieve 69.2% accuracy on these intuitive tasks, even state-of-the-art VLMs struggle, with the best model, Gemini 2.0, achieving only 26.6% accuracy. Current agentic VLMs, which rely on limited vision and vision-language models as tools, perform even worse. This performance gap reveals significant limitations in multimodal systems' ability to select appropriate tools and execute complex reasoning sequences, establishing new directions for advancing practical AI research.
title OWLViz: An Open-World Benchmark for Visual Question Answering
topic Machine Learning
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07631