Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09348 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908706392768512 |
|---|---|
| author | Ye, Zhoutong Sun, Mingze Gao, Huan-ang Wang, Xutong Wang, Xiangyang Mei, Yu Liu, Chang Li, Qinwei Zhang, Chengwen Lan, Qinghuan Yu, Chun Shi, Yuanchun |
| author_facet | Ye, Zhoutong Sun, Mingze Gao, Huan-ang Wang, Xutong Wang, Xiangyang Mei, Yu Liu, Chang Li, Qinwei Zhang, Chengwen Lan, Qinghuan Yu, Chun Shi, Yuanchun |
| contents | Large multimodal models (LMMs) have demonstrated significant potential as generalists in vision-language (VL) tasks. However, adoption of LMMs in real-world tasks is hindered by their poor performance in tasks that require a combination of VL capabilities, as well as in tasks that involve the grounding of complex text or visual instructions. To thoroughly investigate this gap and its underlying causes, we propose MOAT, a diverse benchmark with 1005 complex real-world vision questions that are straightforward for humans but challenging for LMMs. Specifically, the tasks in MOAT require LMMs to engage in generalist problem solving by integrating VL capabilities such as reading text, counting, understanding spatial relations, grounding textual and visual instructions, etc. All these abilities fit into a taxonomy proposed by us that contains 9 VL capabilities, enabling MOAT to provide a fine-grained view of LMMs' strengths and weaknesses. Besides, MOAT is the first benchmark to explicitly evaluate LMMs' ability to ground complex text and visual instructions, which is essential for many real-world applications. We evaluated 17 proprietary and open source LMMs, finding that the best performing LMM (Gemini 2.5 Pro) achieved only 44% accuracy, far below what would be acceptable in real-world applications. To guide future model development, we analyze common trends in our results and discuss the underlying causes of poor performance, focusing on the impact of text-centric reasoning, which VL capabilities form bottlenecks in complex tasks, and the potential harmful effects of tiling. Code and data are available at https://cambrian-yzt.github.io/MOAT/. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_09348 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | MOAT: Evaluating LMMs for Capability Integration and Instruction Grounding Ye, Zhoutong Sun, Mingze Gao, Huan-ang Wang, Xutong Wang, Xiangyang Mei, Yu Liu, Chang Li, Qinwei Zhang, Chengwen Lan, Qinghuan Yu, Chun Shi, Yuanchun Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Large multimodal models (LMMs) have demonstrated significant potential as generalists in vision-language (VL) tasks. However, adoption of LMMs in real-world tasks is hindered by their poor performance in tasks that require a combination of VL capabilities, as well as in tasks that involve the grounding of complex text or visual instructions. To thoroughly investigate this gap and its underlying causes, we propose MOAT, a diverse benchmark with 1005 complex real-world vision questions that are straightforward for humans but challenging for LMMs. Specifically, the tasks in MOAT require LMMs to engage in generalist problem solving by integrating VL capabilities such as reading text, counting, understanding spatial relations, grounding textual and visual instructions, etc. All these abilities fit into a taxonomy proposed by us that contains 9 VL capabilities, enabling MOAT to provide a fine-grained view of LMMs' strengths and weaknesses. Besides, MOAT is the first benchmark to explicitly evaluate LMMs' ability to ground complex text and visual instructions, which is essential for many real-world applications. We evaluated 17 proprietary and open source LMMs, finding that the best performing LMM (Gemini 2.5 Pro) achieved only 44% accuracy, far below what would be acceptable in real-world applications. To guide future model development, we analyze common trends in our results and discuss the underlying causes of poor performance, focusing on the impact of text-centric reasoning, which VL capabilities form bottlenecks in complex tasks, and the potential harmful effects of tiling. Code and data are available at https://cambrian-yzt.github.io/MOAT/. |
| title | MOAT: Evaluating LMMs for Capability Integration and Instruction Grounding |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09348 |