Do Comments and Expertise Still Matter? An Experiment on Programmers' Adoption of AI-Generated JavaScript Code
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911451373895680 |
|---|---|
| author | Li, Changwen Treude, Christoph Turel, Ofir |
| author_facet | Li, Changwen Treude, Christoph Turel, Ofir |
| contents | This paper investigates the factors influencing programmers' adoption of AI-generated JavaScript code recommendations within the context of lightweight, function-level programming tasks. It extends prior research by (1) utilizing objective (as opposed to the typically self-reported) measurements for programmers' adoption of AI-generated code and (2) examining whether AI-generated comments added to code recommendations and development expertise drive AI-generated code adoption. We tested these potential drivers in an online experiment with 173 programmers. Participants were asked to answer some questions to demonstrate their level of development expertise. Then, they were asked to solve a LeetCode problem without AI support. After attempting to solve the problem on their own, they received an AI-generated solution to assist them in refining their solutions. The solutions provided were manipulated to include or exclude AI-generated comments (a between-subjects factor). Programmers' adoption of AI-generated code was gauged by code similarity between AI-generated solutions and participants' submitted solutions, providing a behavioral measurement of code adoption behaviors. Our findings revealed that, within the context of function-level programming tasks, the presence of comments significantly influences programmers' adoption of AI-generated code regardless of the participants' development expertise. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_11453 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Do Comments and Expertise Still Matter? An Experiment on Programmers' Adoption of AI-Generated JavaScript Code Li, Changwen Treude, Christoph Turel, Ofir Software Engineering This paper investigates the factors influencing programmers' adoption of AI-generated JavaScript code recommendations within the context of lightweight, function-level programming tasks. It extends prior research by (1) utilizing objective (as opposed to the typically self-reported) measurements for programmers' adoption of AI-generated code and (2) examining whether AI-generated comments added to code recommendations and development expertise drive AI-generated code adoption. We tested these potential drivers in an online experiment with 173 programmers. Participants were asked to answer some questions to demonstrate their level of development expertise. Then, they were asked to solve a LeetCode problem without AI support. After attempting to solve the problem on their own, they received an AI-generated solution to assist them in refining their solutions. The solutions provided were manipulated to include or exclude AI-generated comments (a between-subjects factor). Programmers' adoption of AI-generated code was gauged by code similarity between AI-generated solutions and participants' submitted solutions, providing a behavioral measurement of code adoption behaviors. Our findings revealed that, within the context of function-level programming tasks, the presence of comments significantly influences programmers' adoption of AI-generated code regardless of the participants' development expertise. |
| title | Do Comments and Expertise Still Matter? An Experiment on Programmers' Adoption of AI-Generated JavaScript Code |
| topic | Software Engineering |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11453 |