Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eckstein, Jonathan, Yu, Chang
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11809
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912589359874048
author Eckstein, Jonathan
Yu, Chang
author_facet Eckstein, Jonathan
Yu, Chang
contents This paper presents two new techniques relating to inexact solution of subproblems in augmented Lagrangian methods for convex programming. The first involves combining a relative error criterion for solution of the subproblems with over- or under-relaxation of the multiplier update step. This analysis enables a new kind of inexact augmented Lagrangian method that adapts the amount of multiplier step relaxation to the accuracy of the subproblem, subject to a viability test employing the discriminant of a certain quadratic function. The second innovation involves solution of augmented Lagrangian subproblems for problems posed in standard Fenchel-Rockafellar form. We show that applying alternating minimization to this subproblem, as in the first two steps of the ADMM, is equivalent to executing the classical proximal gradient method on a dual formulation of the subproblem. By substituting more sophisticated variants of the proximal gradient method for the classical one, it is possible to construct new ADMM-like methods with better empirical performance than using ordinary alternating minimization within an inexact augmented Lagrangian framework. The paper concludes by describing some computational experiments exploring using these two innovations, both separately and jointly, to solve LASSO problems.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_11809
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Two Innovations in Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Methods for Convex Optimization
Eckstein, Jonathan
Yu, Chang
Optimization and Control
This paper presents two new techniques relating to inexact solution of subproblems in augmented Lagrangian methods for convex programming. The first involves combining a relative error criterion for solution of the subproblems with over- or under-relaxation of the multiplier update step. This analysis enables a new kind of inexact augmented Lagrangian method that adapts the amount of multiplier step relaxation to the accuracy of the subproblem, subject to a viability test employing the discriminant of a certain quadratic function. The second innovation involves solution of augmented Lagrangian subproblems for problems posed in standard Fenchel-Rockafellar form. We show that applying alternating minimization to this subproblem, as in the first two steps of the ADMM, is equivalent to executing the classical proximal gradient method on a dual formulation of the subproblem. By substituting more sophisticated variants of the proximal gradient method for the classical one, it is possible to construct new ADMM-like methods with better empirical performance than using ordinary alternating minimization within an inexact augmented Lagrangian framework. The paper concludes by describing some computational experiments exploring using these two innovations, both separately and jointly, to solve LASSO problems.
title Two Innovations in Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Methods for Convex Optimization
topic Optimization and Control
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11809