Evaluating Multilingual Metadata Quality in Crossref
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Donathan II, Dennis, Nason, Mike, Tullney, Marco, Shi, Julie, Alperin, Juan Pablo |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
A pipeline for matching bibliographic references with incomplete metadata: experiments with Crossref and OpenCitations
by: Guenci, Matteo, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Guenci, Matteo, et al.
Published: (2025)
The oligopoly of academic publishers persists in exclusive database
by: van Bellen, Simon, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: van Bellen, Simon, et al.
Published: (2024)
Acceso abierto en Argentina: una propuesta para el monitoreo de las publicaciones científicas con OpenAlex
by: Unzurrunzaga, Carolina, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Unzurrunzaga, Carolina, et al.
Published: (2024)
An analysis of the suitability of OpenAlex for bibliometric analyses
by: Alperin, Juan Pablo, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Alperin, Juan Pablo, et al.
Published: (2024)
Citation Parsing and Analysis with Language Models
by: Sarin, Parth, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Sarin, Parth, et al.
Published: (2025)
Universal and specific features of Ukrainian economic research: publication analysis based on Crossref data
by: Mryglod, O., et al.
Published: (2021)
by: Mryglod, O., et al.
Published: (2021)
Is OpenAlex Suitable for Research Quality Evaluation and Which Citation Indicator is Best?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)
Stark Decline in Journalists' Use of Preprints Post-pandemic
by: Alperin, Juan Pablo, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Alperin, Juan Pablo, et al.
Published: (2024)
Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
by: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Published: (2026)
Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)
Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023
by: Haustein, Stefanie, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Haustein, Stefanie, et al.
Published: (2024)
An open dataset of article processing charges from six large scholarly publishers (2019-2023)
by: Butler, Leigh-Ann, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Butler, Leigh-Ann, et al.
Published: (2024)
Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)
Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)
Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)
Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)
A Workflow for GLAM Metadata Crosswalk
by: Moretti, Arianna, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Moretti, Arianna, et al.
Published: (2024)
Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness
by: Céspedes, Lucía, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Céspedes, Lucía, et al.
Published: (2024)
A Global South Strategy for Evaluating Research Value with ChatGPT
by: Nunkoo, Robin, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Nunkoo, Robin, et al.
Published: (2025)
Works-magnet: Accelerating Metadata Curation for Open Science
by: Jeangirard, Eric
Published: (2025)
by: Jeangirard, Eric
Published: (2025)
Large Language Models for Departmental Expert Review Quality Scores
by: Langfeldt, Liv, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Langfeldt, Liv, et al.
Published: (2026)
Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets
by: O'Connor, Martin J., et al.
Published: (2024)
by: O'Connor, Martin J., et al.
Published: (2024)
Metadata Augmentation using NLP, Machine Learning and AI chatbots: A comparison
by: González-Espinoza, Alfredo, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: González-Espinoza, Alfredo, et al.
Published: (2025)
Beyond Metadata: The Role of DOI, ORCID, and ROR in Shaping Transparent and Interoperable Library Systems
by: Paul, Snehasish
Published: (2026)
by: Paul, Snehasish
Published: (2026)
In which fields do ChatGPT scores align better than citations with research quality?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)
Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)
Prompt perturbation and fraction facilitation sometimes strengthen Large Language Model scores
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)
Do Large Language Models know Which Published Articles have been Retracted?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2026)
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2026)
From Metadata to Storytelling: A Framework For 3D Cultural Heritage Visualization on RDF Data
by: Barzaghi, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Barzaghi, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2025)
Can Small and Reasoning Large Language Models Score Journal Articles for Research Quality and Do Averaging and Few-shot Help?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)
RenoBench: A Citation Parsing Benchmark
by: Sarin, Parth, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Sarin, Parth, et al.
Published: (2026)
SMECS: A Software Metadata Extraction and Curation Software
by: Ferenz, Stephan, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Ferenz, Stephan, et al.
Published: (2025)
Towards a Metadata Schema for Energy Research Software
by: Ferenz, Stephan, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Ferenz, Stephan, et al.
Published: (2026)
Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)
How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2025)
Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2026)
Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)
In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)
Have LLM-associated terms increased in article full texts in all fields?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2026)
Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)
Similar Items
-
A pipeline for matching bibliographic references with incomplete metadata: experiments with Crossref and OpenCitations
by: Guenci, Matteo, et al.
Published: (2025) -
The oligopoly of academic publishers persists in exclusive database
by: van Bellen, Simon, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Acceso abierto en Argentina: una propuesta para el monitoreo de las publicaciones científicas con OpenAlex
by: Unzurrunzaga, Carolina, et al.
Published: (2024) -
An analysis of the suitability of OpenAlex for bibliometric analyses
by: Alperin, Juan Pablo, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Citation Parsing and Analysis with Language Models
by: Sarin, Parth, et al.
Published: (2025)