A robust score test in g-computation for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials leveraging different variance estimators via influence functions

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Xin, Chu, Haitao, Liu, Lin, Roychoudhury, Satrajit
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866917959117570048
author Zhang, Xin
Chu, Haitao
Liu, Lin
Roychoudhury, Satrajit
author_facet Zhang, Xin
Chu, Haitao
Liu, Lin
Roychoudhury, Satrajit
contents G-computation has become a widely used robust method for estimating unconditional (marginal) treatment effects with covariate adjustment in the analysis of randomized clinical trials. Statistical inference in this context typically relies on the Wald test or Wald interval, which can be easily implemented using a consistent variance estimator. However, existing literature suggests that when sample sizes are small or when parameters of interest are near boundary values, Wald-based methods may be less reliable due to type I error rate inflation and insufficient interval coverage. In this article, we propose a robust score test for g-computation estimators in the context of two-sample treatment comparisons. The proposed test is asymptotically valid under simple and stratified (biased-coin) randomization schemes, even when regression models are misspecified. These test statistics can be conveniently computed using existing variance estimators, and the corresponding confidence intervals have closed-form expressions, making them convenient to implement. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate the superior finite-sample performance of the proposed method. Finally, we apply the proposed method to reanalyze a completed randomized clinical trial. The new analysis using our proposed score test achieves statistical significance, whilst reducing the issue of type I error inflation.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_13066
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle A robust score test in g-computation for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials leveraging different variance estimators via influence functions
Zhang, Xin
Chu, Haitao
Liu, Lin
Roychoudhury, Satrajit
Methodology
Applications
G-computation has become a widely used robust method for estimating unconditional (marginal) treatment effects with covariate adjustment in the analysis of randomized clinical trials. Statistical inference in this context typically relies on the Wald test or Wald interval, which can be easily implemented using a consistent variance estimator. However, existing literature suggests that when sample sizes are small or when parameters of interest are near boundary values, Wald-based methods may be less reliable due to type I error rate inflation and insufficient interval coverage. In this article, we propose a robust score test for g-computation estimators in the context of two-sample treatment comparisons. The proposed test is asymptotically valid under simple and stratified (biased-coin) randomization schemes, even when regression models are misspecified. These test statistics can be conveniently computed using existing variance estimators, and the corresponding confidence intervals have closed-form expressions, making them convenient to implement. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate the superior finite-sample performance of the proposed method. Finally, we apply the proposed method to reanalyze a completed randomized clinical trial. The new analysis using our proposed score test achieves statistical significance, whilst reducing the issue of type I error inflation.
title A robust score test in g-computation for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials leveraging different variance estimators via influence functions
topic Methodology
Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13066