Impact of Extended Reality on Robot-Assisted Surgery Training
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866915206225985536 |
|---|---|
| author | Bickford, Michael Alruwaili, Fayez Ragab, Sara Rothenberg, Hanna Abedin-Nasab, Mohammad |
| author_facet | Bickford, Michael Alruwaili, Fayez Ragab, Sara Rothenberg, Hanna Abedin-Nasab, Mohammad |
| contents | Robot Assisted Surgeries (RAS) have one of the steepest learning curves of any type of surgery. Because of this, methods to practice RAS outside the operating room have been developed to improve the surgeons skills. These strategies include the incorporation of extended reality simulators into surgical training programs. In this Systematic review, we seek to determine if extended reality simulators can improve the performance of novice surgeons and how their performance compares to the conventional training of surgeons on Surgical robots. Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for studies that compared the performance of novice surgeons that received no additional training, trained with extended reality, or trained with inanimate physical simulators (conventional additional training). We included articles that gauged performance using either GEARS or Time to complete measurements and used SPSS to perform a meta-analysis to compare the performance outcomes of the surgeons after training. Surgeons trained using extended reality completed their surgical tasks statistically significantly faster than those who did not receive training (Cohen's d=-0.95, p=0.02), and moderately slower than those conventionally trained (Cohen's d=0.65, p=0.14). However, this difference was not statistically significant. Surgeons trained on extended reality demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in GEARS scores over those who did not train (Cohen's d=0.964, p<0.001). While surgeons trained in extended reality had comparable GEARS scores to surgeons trained conventionally (Cohen's d=0.65, p=0.14). This meta-analysis demonstrates that extended reality simulators translated complex skills to surgeons in a low cost and low risk environment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_15503 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Impact of Extended Reality on Robot-Assisted Surgery Training Bickford, Michael Alruwaili, Fayez Ragab, Sara Rothenberg, Hanna Abedin-Nasab, Mohammad Human-Computer Interaction Robotics Robot Assisted Surgeries (RAS) have one of the steepest learning curves of any type of surgery. Because of this, methods to practice RAS outside the operating room have been developed to improve the surgeons skills. These strategies include the incorporation of extended reality simulators into surgical training programs. In this Systematic review, we seek to determine if extended reality simulators can improve the performance of novice surgeons and how their performance compares to the conventional training of surgeons on Surgical robots. Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for studies that compared the performance of novice surgeons that received no additional training, trained with extended reality, or trained with inanimate physical simulators (conventional additional training). We included articles that gauged performance using either GEARS or Time to complete measurements and used SPSS to perform a meta-analysis to compare the performance outcomes of the surgeons after training. Surgeons trained using extended reality completed their surgical tasks statistically significantly faster than those who did not receive training (Cohen's d=-0.95, p=0.02), and moderately slower than those conventionally trained (Cohen's d=0.65, p=0.14). However, this difference was not statistically significant. Surgeons trained on extended reality demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in GEARS scores over those who did not train (Cohen's d=0.964, p<0.001). While surgeons trained in extended reality had comparable GEARS scores to surgeons trained conventionally (Cohen's d=0.65, p=0.14). This meta-analysis demonstrates that extended reality simulators translated complex skills to surgeons in a low cost and low risk environment. |
| title | Impact of Extended Reality on Robot-Assisted Surgery Training |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction Robotics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15503 |