Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lara-Rangel, Jose, Heinbaugh, Clare
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15902
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866913747565543424
author Lara-Rangel, Jose
Heinbaugh, Clare
author_facet Lara-Rangel, Jose
Heinbaugh, Clare
contents Brain connectomes offer detailed maps of neural connections within the brain. Recent studies have proposed novel connectome graph datasets and attempted to improve connectome classification by using graph deep learning. With recent advances demonstrating transformers' ability to model intricate relationships and outperform in various domains, this work explores their performance on the novel NeuroGraph benchmark datasets and synthetic variants derived from probabilistically removing edges to simulate noisy data. Our findings suggest that graph transformers offer no major advantage over traditional GNNs on this dataset. Furthermore, both traditional and transformer GNN models maintain accuracy even with all edges removed, suggesting that the dataset's graph structures may not significantly impact predictions. We propose further assessing NeuroGraph as a brain connectome benchmark, emphasizing the need for well-curated datasets and improved preprocessing strategies to obtain meaningful edge connections.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_15902
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On the Limits of Applying Graph Transformers for Brain Connectome Classification
Lara-Rangel, Jose
Heinbaugh, Clare
Machine Learning
Brain connectomes offer detailed maps of neural connections within the brain. Recent studies have proposed novel connectome graph datasets and attempted to improve connectome classification by using graph deep learning. With recent advances demonstrating transformers' ability to model intricate relationships and outperform in various domains, this work explores their performance on the novel NeuroGraph benchmark datasets and synthetic variants derived from probabilistically removing edges to simulate noisy data. Our findings suggest that graph transformers offer no major advantage over traditional GNNs on this dataset. Furthermore, both traditional and transformer GNN models maintain accuracy even with all edges removed, suggesting that the dataset's graph structures may not significantly impact predictions. We propose further assessing NeuroGraph as a brain connectome benchmark, emphasizing the need for well-curated datasets and improved preprocessing strategies to obtain meaningful edge connections.
title On the Limits of Applying Graph Transformers for Brain Connectome Classification
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15902