"Playing the robot's advocate": Bystanders' descriptions of a robot's conduct in public settings

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Rudaz, Damien, Licoppe, Christian
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866916658952536064
author Rudaz, Damien
Licoppe, Christian
author_facet Rudaz, Damien
Licoppe, Christian
contents Relying on a large corpus of natural interactions between visitors and a robot in a museum setting, we study a recurrent practice through which humans "worked" to maintain the robot as a competent participant: the description by bystanders, in a way that was made accessible to the main speaker, of the social action that the robot was taken to be accomplishing. Doing so, bystanders maintained the robot's (sometimes incongruous) behaviour as relevant to the activity at hand and preserved the robot itself as a competent participant. Relying on these data, we argue that ex ante definitions of a robot as "social" (i.e. before any interaction occurred) run the risk of naturalizing as self-evident the observable result from micro-sociological processes: namely, the interactional work of co-present humans through which the robot's conduct is reconfigured as contextually relevant.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_16889
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle "Playing the robot's advocate": Bystanders' descriptions of a robot's conduct in public settings
Rudaz, Damien
Licoppe, Christian
Human-Computer Interaction
Relying on a large corpus of natural interactions between visitors and a robot in a museum setting, we study a recurrent practice through which humans "worked" to maintain the robot as a competent participant: the description by bystanders, in a way that was made accessible to the main speaker, of the social action that the robot was taken to be accomplishing. Doing so, bystanders maintained the robot's (sometimes incongruous) behaviour as relevant to the activity at hand and preserved the robot itself as a competent participant. Relying on these data, we argue that ex ante definitions of a robot as "social" (i.e. before any interaction occurred) run the risk of naturalizing as self-evident the observable result from micro-sociological processes: namely, the interactional work of co-present humans through which the robot's conduct is reconfigured as contextually relevant.
title "Playing the robot's advocate": Bystanders' descriptions of a robot's conduct in public settings
topic Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16889