On the Importance of Error Mitigation for Quantum Computation

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Aharonov, Dorit, Alberton, Ori, Arad, Itai, Atia, Yosi, Bairey, Eyal, Brakerski, Zvika, Cohen, Itsik, Golan, Omri, Gurwich, Ilya, Kenneth, Oded, Leviatan, Eyal, Lindner, Netanel H., Melcer, Ron Aharon, Meyer, Adiel, Schul, Gili, Shutman, Maor
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866909547493326848
author Aharonov, Dorit
Alberton, Ori
Arad, Itai
Atia, Yosi
Bairey, Eyal
Brakerski, Zvika
Cohen, Itsik
Golan, Omri
Gurwich, Ilya
Kenneth, Oded
Leviatan, Eyal
Lindner, Netanel H.
Melcer, Ron Aharon
Meyer, Adiel
Schul, Gili
Shutman, Maor
author_facet Aharonov, Dorit
Alberton, Ori
Arad, Itai
Atia, Yosi
Bairey, Eyal
Brakerski, Zvika
Cohen, Itsik
Golan, Omri
Gurwich, Ilya
Kenneth, Oded
Leviatan, Eyal
Lindner, Netanel H.
Melcer, Ron Aharon
Meyer, Adiel
Schul, Gili
Shutman, Maor
contents Quantum error mitigation (EM) is a family of hybrid quantum-classical methods for eliminating or reducing the effect of noise and decoherence on quantum algorithms run on quantum hardware, without applying quantum error correction (EC). While EM has many benefits compared to EC, specifically that it requires no (or little) qubit overhead, this benefit comes with a painful price: EM seems to necessitate an overhead in quantum run time which grows as a (mild) exponent. Accordingly, recent results show that EM alone cannot enable exponential quantum advantages (QAs), for an average variant of the expectation value estimation problem. These works raised concerns regarding the role of EM in the road map towards QAs. We aim to demystify the discussion and provide a clear picture of the role of EM in achieving QAs, both in the near and long term. We first propose a clear distinction between finite QA and asymptotic QA, which is crucial to the understanding of the question, and present the notion of circuit volume boost, which we claim is an adequate way to quantify the benefits of EM. Using these notions, we can argue straightforwardly that EM is expected to have a significant role in achieving QAs. Specifically, that EM is likely to be the first error reduction method for useful finite QAs, before EC; that the first such QAs are expected to be achieved using EM in the very near future; and that EM is expected to maintain its important role in quantum computation even when EC will be routinely used - for as long as high-quality qubits remain a scarce resource.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_17243
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On the Importance of Error Mitigation for Quantum Computation
Aharonov, Dorit
Alberton, Ori
Arad, Itai
Atia, Yosi
Bairey, Eyal
Brakerski, Zvika
Cohen, Itsik
Golan, Omri
Gurwich, Ilya
Kenneth, Oded
Leviatan, Eyal
Lindner, Netanel H.
Melcer, Ron Aharon
Meyer, Adiel
Schul, Gili
Shutman, Maor
Quantum Physics
Strongly Correlated Electrons
Computational Complexity
Quantum error mitigation (EM) is a family of hybrid quantum-classical methods for eliminating or reducing the effect of noise and decoherence on quantum algorithms run on quantum hardware, without applying quantum error correction (EC). While EM has many benefits compared to EC, specifically that it requires no (or little) qubit overhead, this benefit comes with a painful price: EM seems to necessitate an overhead in quantum run time which grows as a (mild) exponent. Accordingly, recent results show that EM alone cannot enable exponential quantum advantages (QAs), for an average variant of the expectation value estimation problem. These works raised concerns regarding the role of EM in the road map towards QAs. We aim to demystify the discussion and provide a clear picture of the role of EM in achieving QAs, both in the near and long term. We first propose a clear distinction between finite QA and asymptotic QA, which is crucial to the understanding of the question, and present the notion of circuit volume boost, which we claim is an adequate way to quantify the benefits of EM. Using these notions, we can argue straightforwardly that EM is expected to have a significant role in achieving QAs. Specifically, that EM is likely to be the first error reduction method for useful finite QAs, before EC; that the first such QAs are expected to be achieved using EM in the very near future; and that EM is expected to maintain its important role in quantum computation even when EC will be routinely used - for as long as high-quality qubits remain a scarce resource.
title On the Importance of Error Mitigation for Quantum Computation
topic Quantum Physics
Strongly Correlated Electrons
Computational Complexity
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17243