Understanding and Mitigating Covert Channel and Side Channel Vulnerabilities Introduced by RowHammer Defenses
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866912652622561280 |
|---|---|
| author | Bostancı, F. Nisa Canpolat, Oğuzhan Olgun, Ataberk Yüksel, İsmail Emir Kanellopoulos, Konstantinos Sadrosadati, Mohammad Yağlıkçı, A. Giray Mutlu, Onur |
| author_facet | Bostancı, F. Nisa Canpolat, Oğuzhan Olgun, Ataberk Yüksel, İsmail Emir Kanellopoulos, Konstantinos Sadrosadati, Mohammad Yağlıkçı, A. Giray Mutlu, Onur |
| contents | DRAM chips are vulnerable to read disturbance phenomena (e.g., RowHammer and RowPress), where repeatedly accessing or keeping open a DRAM row causes bitflips in nearby rows. Attackers leverage RowHammer bitflips in real systems to take over systems and leak data. Consequently, many prior works propose defenses, including recent DDR specifications introducing new defenses (e.g., PRAC and RFM). For robust operation, it is critical to analyze other security implications of RowHammer defenses. Unfortunately, no prior work analyzes the timing covert and side channel vulnerabilities introduced by RowHammer defenses.
This paper presents the first analysis and evaluation of timing covert and side channel vulnerabilities introduced by state-of-the-art RowHammer defenses. We demonstrate that RowHammer defenses' preventive actions have two fundamental features that enable timing channels. First, preventive actions reduce DRAM bandwidth availability, resulting in longer memory latencies. Second, preventive actions can be triggered on demand depending on memory access patterns.
We introduce LeakyHammer, a new class of attacks that leverage the RowHammer defense-induced memory latency differences to establish communication channels and leak secrets. First, we build two covert channel attacks exploiting two state-of-the-art RowHammer defenses, achieving 39.0 Kbps and 48.7 Kbps channel capacity. Second, we demonstrate a website fingerprinting attack that identifies visited websites based on the RowHammer-preventive actions they cause. We propose and evaluate three countermeasures against LeakyHammer. Our results show that fundamentally mitigating LeakyHammer induces large performance overheads in highly RowHammer-vulnerable systems. We believe and hope our work can enable and aid future work on designing better solutions and more robust systems in the presence of such new vulnerabilities. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_17891 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Understanding and Mitigating Covert Channel and Side Channel Vulnerabilities Introduced by RowHammer Defenses Bostancı, F. Nisa Canpolat, Oğuzhan Olgun, Ataberk Yüksel, İsmail Emir Kanellopoulos, Konstantinos Sadrosadati, Mohammad Yağlıkçı, A. Giray Mutlu, Onur Cryptography and Security Hardware Architecture DRAM chips are vulnerable to read disturbance phenomena (e.g., RowHammer and RowPress), where repeatedly accessing or keeping open a DRAM row causes bitflips in nearby rows. Attackers leverage RowHammer bitflips in real systems to take over systems and leak data. Consequently, many prior works propose defenses, including recent DDR specifications introducing new defenses (e.g., PRAC and RFM). For robust operation, it is critical to analyze other security implications of RowHammer defenses. Unfortunately, no prior work analyzes the timing covert and side channel vulnerabilities introduced by RowHammer defenses. This paper presents the first analysis and evaluation of timing covert and side channel vulnerabilities introduced by state-of-the-art RowHammer defenses. We demonstrate that RowHammer defenses' preventive actions have two fundamental features that enable timing channels. First, preventive actions reduce DRAM bandwidth availability, resulting in longer memory latencies. Second, preventive actions can be triggered on demand depending on memory access patterns. We introduce LeakyHammer, a new class of attacks that leverage the RowHammer defense-induced memory latency differences to establish communication channels and leak secrets. First, we build two covert channel attacks exploiting two state-of-the-art RowHammer defenses, achieving 39.0 Kbps and 48.7 Kbps channel capacity. Second, we demonstrate a website fingerprinting attack that identifies visited websites based on the RowHammer-preventive actions they cause. We propose and evaluate three countermeasures against LeakyHammer. Our results show that fundamentally mitigating LeakyHammer induces large performance overheads in highly RowHammer-vulnerable systems. We believe and hope our work can enable and aid future work on designing better solutions and more robust systems in the presence of such new vulnerabilities. |
| title | Understanding and Mitigating Covert Channel and Side Channel Vulnerabilities Introduced by RowHammer Defenses |
| topic | Cryptography and Security Hardware Architecture |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17891 |