Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elkantassi, Soumaya, Chavez-Demoulin, Valérie, Davison, Anthony C., Hejduk, Matthew D., Morris, Hunter A.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20085
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917968360767488
author Elkantassi, Soumaya
Chavez-Demoulin, Valérie
Davison, Anthony C.
Hejduk, Matthew D.
Morris, Hunter A.
author_facet Elkantassi, Soumaya
Chavez-Demoulin, Valérie
Davison, Anthony C.
Hejduk, Matthew D.
Morris, Hunter A.
contents Satellite conjunctions involving near misses of space objects are increasingly common, especially with the growth of satellite constellations and space debris. Accurate risk analysis for these events is essential to prevent collisions and manage space traffic. Traditional methods for assessing collision risk, such as calculating the so-called collision probability, are widely used but have limitations, including counterintuitive interpretations when uncertainty in the state vector is large. To address these limitations, we build on an alternative approach proposed by Elkantassi and Davison (2022) that uses a statistical model allowing inference on the miss distance between two objects in the presence of nuisance parameters. This model provides significance probabilities for a null hypothesis that assumes a small miss distance and allows the construction of confidence intervals, leading to another interpretation of collision risk. In this study, we compare this approach with the traditional use of pc across a large, NASA-provided dataset of real conjunctions, in order to evaluate its reliability and to refine the statistical framework to improve its suitability for operational decision-making. We also discuss constraints that could limit the practical use of such alternative approaches.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_20085
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Statistical Inference on the Miss Distance Compared to Collision Probability for Conjunction Analysis
Elkantassi, Soumaya
Chavez-Demoulin, Valérie
Davison, Anthony C.
Hejduk, Matthew D.
Morris, Hunter A.
Applications
Satellite conjunctions involving near misses of space objects are increasingly common, especially with the growth of satellite constellations and space debris. Accurate risk analysis for these events is essential to prevent collisions and manage space traffic. Traditional methods for assessing collision risk, such as calculating the so-called collision probability, are widely used but have limitations, including counterintuitive interpretations when uncertainty in the state vector is large. To address these limitations, we build on an alternative approach proposed by Elkantassi and Davison (2022) that uses a statistical model allowing inference on the miss distance between two objects in the presence of nuisance parameters. This model provides significance probabilities for a null hypothesis that assumes a small miss distance and allows the construction of confidence intervals, leading to another interpretation of collision risk. In this study, we compare this approach with the traditional use of pc across a large, NASA-provided dataset of real conjunctions, in order to evaluate its reliability and to refine the statistical framework to improve its suitability for operational decision-making. We also discuss constraints that could limit the practical use of such alternative approaches.
title Statistical Inference on the Miss Distance Compared to Collision Probability for Conjunction Analysis
topic Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20085