Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xiaoran, Xue, Zhaoqian, Zhang, Chi, Medri, Jhonatan, Xiong, Junjie, Zhou, Jiayan, Jin, Jin, Zhang, Yongfeng, Ma, Siyuan, Li, Lingyao
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20981
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866909047928651776
author Xu, Xiaoran
Xue, Zhaoqian
Zhang, Chi
Medri, Jhonatan
Xiong, Junjie
Zhou, Jiayan
Jin, Jin
Zhang, Yongfeng
Ma, Siyuan
Li, Lingyao
author_facet Xu, Xiaoran
Xue, Zhaoqian
Zhang, Chi
Medri, Jhonatan
Xiong, Junjie
Zhou, Jiayan
Jin, Jin
Zhang, Yongfeng
Ma, Siyuan
Li, Lingyao
contents Investigating the public experience of urgent care facilities is essential for promoting community healthcare development. Traditional survey methods often fall short due to limited scope, time, and spatial coverage. Crowdsourcing through online reviews or social media offers a valuable approach to gaining such insights. With recent advancements in large language models (LLMs), extracting nuanced perceptions from reviews has become feasible. This study collects Google Maps reviews across the DMV and Florida areas and conducts prompt engineering with the GPT model to analyze the aspect-based sentiment of urgent care. We first analyze the geospatial patterns of various aspects, including interpersonal factors, operational efficiency, technical quality, finances, and facilities. Next, we determine Census Block Group (CBG)-level characteristics underpinning differences in public perception, including population density, median income, GINI Index, rent-to-income ratio, household below poverty rate, no insurance rate, and unemployment rate. Our results show that interpersonal factors and operational efficiency emerge as the strongest determinants of patient satisfaction in urgent care, while technical quality, finances, and facilities show no significant independent effects when adjusted for in multivariate models. Among socioeconomic and demographic factors, only population density demonstrates a significant but modest association with patient ratings, while the remaining factors exhibit no significant correlations. Overall, this study highlights the potential of crowdsourcing to uncover the key factors that matter to residents and provide valuable insights for stakeholders to improve public satisfaction with urgent care.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_20981
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Patients Speak, AI Listens: LLM-based Analysis of Online Reviews Uncovers Key Drivers for Urgent Care Satisfaction
Xu, Xiaoran
Xue, Zhaoqian
Zhang, Chi
Medri, Jhonatan
Xiong, Junjie
Zhou, Jiayan
Jin, Jin
Zhang, Yongfeng
Ma, Siyuan
Li, Lingyao
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Social and Information Networks
Investigating the public experience of urgent care facilities is essential for promoting community healthcare development. Traditional survey methods often fall short due to limited scope, time, and spatial coverage. Crowdsourcing through online reviews or social media offers a valuable approach to gaining such insights. With recent advancements in large language models (LLMs), extracting nuanced perceptions from reviews has become feasible. This study collects Google Maps reviews across the DMV and Florida areas and conducts prompt engineering with the GPT model to analyze the aspect-based sentiment of urgent care. We first analyze the geospatial patterns of various aspects, including interpersonal factors, operational efficiency, technical quality, finances, and facilities. Next, we determine Census Block Group (CBG)-level characteristics underpinning differences in public perception, including population density, median income, GINI Index, rent-to-income ratio, household below poverty rate, no insurance rate, and unemployment rate. Our results show that interpersonal factors and operational efficiency emerge as the strongest determinants of patient satisfaction in urgent care, while technical quality, finances, and facilities show no significant independent effects when adjusted for in multivariate models. Among socioeconomic and demographic factors, only population density demonstrates a significant but modest association with patient ratings, while the remaining factors exhibit no significant correlations. Overall, this study highlights the potential of crowdsourcing to uncover the key factors that matter to residents and provide valuable insights for stakeholders to improve public satisfaction with urgent care.
title Patients Speak, AI Listens: LLM-based Analysis of Online Reviews Uncovers Key Drivers for Urgent Care Satisfaction
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Social and Information Networks
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20981