Real-Time Evaluation Models for RAG: Who Detects Hallucinations Best?

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sardana, Ashish
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866912312662687744
author Sardana, Ashish
author_facet Sardana, Ashish
contents This article surveys Evaluation models to automatically detect hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and presents a comprehensive benchmark of their performance across six RAG applications. Methods included in our study include: LLM-as-a-Judge, Prometheus, Lynx, the Hughes Hallucination Evaluation Model (HHEM), and the Trustworthy Language Model (TLM). These approaches are all reference-free, requiring no ground-truth answers/labels to catch incorrect LLM responses. Our study reveals that, across diverse RAG applications, some of these approaches consistently detect incorrect RAG responses with high precision/recall.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_21157
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Real-Time Evaluation Models for RAG: Who Detects Hallucinations Best?
Sardana, Ashish
Machine Learning
This article surveys Evaluation models to automatically detect hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and presents a comprehensive benchmark of their performance across six RAG applications. Methods included in our study include: LLM-as-a-Judge, Prometheus, Lynx, the Hughes Hallucination Evaluation Model (HHEM), and the Trustworthy Language Model (TLM). These approaches are all reference-free, requiring no ground-truth answers/labels to catch incorrect LLM responses. Our study reveals that, across diverse RAG applications, some of these approaches consistently detect incorrect RAG responses with high precision/recall.
title Real-Time Evaluation Models for RAG: Who Detects Hallucinations Best?
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21157