Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21645 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915216542924800 |
|---|---|
| author | Grgic, Sinisa |
| author_facet | Grgic, Sinisa |
| contents | This study provides a comparative evaluation of global diplomatic mission directories. DiplomaticMonitor.org, EmbassyPages.com, and WikiData.org are strategically selected among the top ten global services. After analyzing nearly all available online global diplomatic directory services, these three platforms are selected as they represent fundamentally different approaches to creating worldwide diplomatic mission databases. Using official diplomatic lists from over 150 countries as benchmarks, we assessed data coverage, accuracy, and update frequency across these platforms. DiplomaticMonitor consistently outperforms its counterparts in structure, completeness, and timeliness, accurately reflecting ambassadorial appointment cycles and maintaining high precision across contact and personnel records. EmbassyPages, despite strong search engine visibility and widespread usage, exhibits significant data currency issues, with markedly diminished ambassadorial accuracy attributable to delayed refresh cycles. WikiData offers valuable historical documentation and open-source accessibility but lacks the consistency and verification protocols necessary for reliable real-time diplomatic information. Our findings highlight the critical challenge posed by the absence of a standardized global diplomatic mission registry. In this fragmented landscape, methodologically rigorous third-party platforms can occasionally surpass government-published records in quality and utility. The research demonstrates that in contemporary digital diplomacy, data reliability correlates less with institutional provenance than with disciplined, transparent, and consistent data stewardship practices. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_21645 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Mapping the Digital Diplomatic Infrastructure: A Comparative Evaluation of Global Online Directories for Diplomatic Missions Grgic, Sinisa Digital Libraries 68P20, 91D30 H.3.7; H.3.5; K.4.3 This study provides a comparative evaluation of global diplomatic mission directories. DiplomaticMonitor.org, EmbassyPages.com, and WikiData.org are strategically selected among the top ten global services. After analyzing nearly all available online global diplomatic directory services, these three platforms are selected as they represent fundamentally different approaches to creating worldwide diplomatic mission databases. Using official diplomatic lists from over 150 countries as benchmarks, we assessed data coverage, accuracy, and update frequency across these platforms. DiplomaticMonitor consistently outperforms its counterparts in structure, completeness, and timeliness, accurately reflecting ambassadorial appointment cycles and maintaining high precision across contact and personnel records. EmbassyPages, despite strong search engine visibility and widespread usage, exhibits significant data currency issues, with markedly diminished ambassadorial accuracy attributable to delayed refresh cycles. WikiData offers valuable historical documentation and open-source accessibility but lacks the consistency and verification protocols necessary for reliable real-time diplomatic information. Our findings highlight the critical challenge posed by the absence of a standardized global diplomatic mission registry. In this fragmented landscape, methodologically rigorous third-party platforms can occasionally surpass government-published records in quality and utility. The research demonstrates that in contemporary digital diplomacy, data reliability correlates less with institutional provenance than with disciplined, transparent, and consistent data stewardship practices. |
| title | Mapping the Digital Diplomatic Infrastructure: A Comparative Evaluation of Global Online Directories for Diplomatic Missions |
| topic | Digital Libraries 68P20, 91D30 H.3.7; H.3.5; K.4.3 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21645 |