Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22812 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916665754648576 |
|---|---|
| author | Hector, Emily C. Cella, Leonardo Martin, Ryan |
| author_facet | Hector, Emily C. Cella, Leonardo Martin, Ryan |
| contents | Divide-and-conquer methods use large-sample approximations to provide frequentist guarantees when each block of data is both small enough to facilitate efficient computation and large enough to support approximately valid inferences. When the overall sample size is small or moderate, likely no suitable division of the data meets both requirements, hence the resulting inference lacks validity guarantees. We propose a new approach, couched in the inferential model framework, that is fully conditional in a Bayesian sense and provably valid in a frequentist sense. The main insight is that existing divide-and-conquer approaches make use of a Gaussianity assumption twice: first in the construction of an estimator, and second in the approximation to its sampling distribution. Our proposal is to retain the first Gaussianity assumption, using a Gaussian working likelihood, but to replace the second with a validification step that uses the sampling distributions of the block summaries determined by the posited model. This latter step, a type of probability-to-possibility transform, is key to the reliability guarantees enjoyed by our approach, which are uniquely general in the divide-and-conquer literature. In addition to finite-sample validity guarantees, our proposed approach is also asymptotically efficient like the other divide-and-conquer solutions available in the literature. Our computational strategy leverages state-of-the-art black-box likelihood emulators. We demonstrate our method's performance via simulations and highlight its flexibility with an analysis of median PM2.5 in Maryborough, Queensland, during the 2023 Australian bushfire season. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_22812 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Divide-and-conquer with finite sample sizes: valid and efficient possibilistic inference Hector, Emily C. Cella, Leonardo Martin, Ryan Methodology Divide-and-conquer methods use large-sample approximations to provide frequentist guarantees when each block of data is both small enough to facilitate efficient computation and large enough to support approximately valid inferences. When the overall sample size is small or moderate, likely no suitable division of the data meets both requirements, hence the resulting inference lacks validity guarantees. We propose a new approach, couched in the inferential model framework, that is fully conditional in a Bayesian sense and provably valid in a frequentist sense. The main insight is that existing divide-and-conquer approaches make use of a Gaussianity assumption twice: first in the construction of an estimator, and second in the approximation to its sampling distribution. Our proposal is to retain the first Gaussianity assumption, using a Gaussian working likelihood, but to replace the second with a validification step that uses the sampling distributions of the block summaries determined by the posited model. This latter step, a type of probability-to-possibility transform, is key to the reliability guarantees enjoyed by our approach, which are uniquely general in the divide-and-conquer literature. In addition to finite-sample validity guarantees, our proposed approach is also asymptotically efficient like the other divide-and-conquer solutions available in the literature. Our computational strategy leverages state-of-the-art black-box likelihood emulators. We demonstrate our method's performance via simulations and highlight its flexibility with an analysis of median PM2.5 in Maryborough, Queensland, during the 2023 Australian bushfire season. |
| title | Divide-and-conquer with finite sample sizes: valid and efficient possibilistic inference |
| topic | Methodology |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22812 |