A Falsifiability Test for Classical Nucleation Theory
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866913766094929920 |
|---|---|
| author | Beneduce, Camilla Pinto, Diogo E. P. Rovigatti, Lorenzo Romano, Flavio Šulc, Petr Sciortino, Francesco Russo, John |
| author_facet | Beneduce, Camilla Pinto, Diogo E. P. Rovigatti, Lorenzo Romano, Flavio Šulc, Petr Sciortino, Francesco Russo, John |
| contents | Classical nucleation theory (CNT) is built upon the capillarity approximation, i.e., the assumption that the nucleation properties can be inferred from the bulk properties of the melt and the crystal. Although CNT's simplicity and usefulness cannot be overstated, experiments and simulations regularly uncover significant deviations from its predictions, which are often reconciled through phenomenological extensions of the CNT, fueling the debate over the general validity of the theory. In this study, we present a falsifiability test for any nucleation theory grounded in the capillarity approximation. We focus on cases where the theory predicts no differences in nucleation rates between different crystal polymorphs. We then introduce a system in which all polymorphs have the same free energy (both bulk and interfacial) across all state points. Through extensive molecular simulations, we show that the polymorphs exhibit remarkably different nucleation properties, directly contradicting CNT's predictions. We argue that CNT's primary limitation lies in its neglect of structural fluctuations within the liquid phase. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_23124 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Falsifiability Test for Classical Nucleation Theory Beneduce, Camilla Pinto, Diogo E. P. Rovigatti, Lorenzo Romano, Flavio Šulc, Petr Sciortino, Francesco Russo, John Soft Condensed Matter Classical nucleation theory (CNT) is built upon the capillarity approximation, i.e., the assumption that the nucleation properties can be inferred from the bulk properties of the melt and the crystal. Although CNT's simplicity and usefulness cannot be overstated, experiments and simulations regularly uncover significant deviations from its predictions, which are often reconciled through phenomenological extensions of the CNT, fueling the debate over the general validity of the theory. In this study, we present a falsifiability test for any nucleation theory grounded in the capillarity approximation. We focus on cases where the theory predicts no differences in nucleation rates between different crystal polymorphs. We then introduce a system in which all polymorphs have the same free energy (both bulk and interfacial) across all state points. Through extensive molecular simulations, we show that the polymorphs exhibit remarkably different nucleation properties, directly contradicting CNT's predictions. We argue that CNT's primary limitation lies in its neglect of structural fluctuations within the liquid phase. |
| title | A Falsifiability Test for Classical Nucleation Theory |
| topic | Soft Condensed Matter |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23124 |