Davenport-Heilbronn Function Ratio Properties and Non-Trivial Zeros Study

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu, Tao, Wu, Juhao
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908345521143808
author Liu, Tao
Wu, Juhao
author_facet Liu, Tao
Wu, Juhao
contents This paper systematically investigates the analytic properties of the ratio $f(s)/f(1-s) = X(s)$ based on the Davenport-Heilbronn functional equation $f(s) = X(s)f(1-s)$. We propose a novel method to analyze the distribution of non-trivial zeros through the monotonicity of the ratio $|f(s)/f(1-s)|$. Rigorously proving that non-trivial zeros can only lie on the critical line $σ=1/2$, we highlight two groundbreaking findings: 1. Contradiction of Off-Critical Zeros: Numerical "exceptional zeros" (e.g., Spira, 1994) violate the theoretical threshold $κ=1.21164$ and conflict with the monotonicity constraint of $|X(s)|=1$. 2. Essential Difference Between Approximate and Strict Zeros: Points satisfying $f(s) \to 0$ do not constitute strict zeros unless verified by analyticity. This work provides a new perspective for studying zero distributions of $L$-functions related to the Riemann Hypothesis.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2503_24275
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Davenport-Heilbronn Function Ratio Properties and Non-Trivial Zeros Study
Liu, Tao
Wu, Juhao
General Mathematics
This paper systematically investigates the analytic properties of the ratio $f(s)/f(1-s) = X(s)$ based on the Davenport-Heilbronn functional equation $f(s) = X(s)f(1-s)$. We propose a novel method to analyze the distribution of non-trivial zeros through the monotonicity of the ratio $|f(s)/f(1-s)|$. Rigorously proving that non-trivial zeros can only lie on the critical line $σ=1/2$, we highlight two groundbreaking findings: 1. Contradiction of Off-Critical Zeros: Numerical "exceptional zeros" (e.g., Spira, 1994) violate the theoretical threshold $κ=1.21164$ and conflict with the monotonicity constraint of $|X(s)|=1$. 2. Essential Difference Between Approximate and Strict Zeros: Points satisfying $f(s) \to 0$ do not constitute strict zeros unless verified by analyticity. This work provides a new perspective for studying zero distributions of $L$-functions related to the Riemann Hypothesis.
title Davenport-Heilbronn Function Ratio Properties and Non-Trivial Zeros Study
topic General Mathematics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.24275