Automated Factual Benchmarking for In-Car Conversational Systems using Large Language Models
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916671162155008 |
|---|---|
| author | Giebisch, Rafael Friedl, Ken E. Sorokin, Lev Stocco, Andrea |
| author_facet | Giebisch, Rafael Friedl, Ken E. Sorokin, Lev Stocco, Andrea |
| contents | In-car conversational systems bring the promise to improve the in-vehicle user experience. Modern conversational systems are based on Large Language Models (LLMs), which makes them prone to errors such as hallucinations, i.e., inaccurate, fictitious, and therefore factually incorrect information. In this paper, we present an LLM-based methodology for the automatic factual benchmarking of in-car conversational systems. We instantiate our methodology with five LLM-based methods, leveraging ensembling techniques and diverse personae to enhance agreement and minimize hallucinations. We use our methodology to evaluate CarExpert, an in-car retrieval-augmented conversational question answering system, with respect to the factual correctness to a vehicle's manual. We produced a novel dataset specifically created for the in-car domain, and tested our methodology against an expert evaluation. Our results show that the combination of GPT-4 with the Input Output Prompting achieves over 90 per cent factual correctness agreement rate with expert evaluations, other than being the most efficient approach yielding an average response time of 4.5s. Our findings suggest that LLM-based testing constitutes a viable approach for the validation of conversational systems regarding their factual correctness. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_01248 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Automated Factual Benchmarking for In-Car Conversational Systems using Large Language Models Giebisch, Rafael Friedl, Ken E. Sorokin, Lev Stocco, Andrea Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Software Engineering In-car conversational systems bring the promise to improve the in-vehicle user experience. Modern conversational systems are based on Large Language Models (LLMs), which makes them prone to errors such as hallucinations, i.e., inaccurate, fictitious, and therefore factually incorrect information. In this paper, we present an LLM-based methodology for the automatic factual benchmarking of in-car conversational systems. We instantiate our methodology with five LLM-based methods, leveraging ensembling techniques and diverse personae to enhance agreement and minimize hallucinations. We use our methodology to evaluate CarExpert, an in-car retrieval-augmented conversational question answering system, with respect to the factual correctness to a vehicle's manual. We produced a novel dataset specifically created for the in-car domain, and tested our methodology against an expert evaluation. Our results show that the combination of GPT-4 with the Input Output Prompting achieves over 90 per cent factual correctness agreement rate with expert evaluations, other than being the most efficient approach yielding an average response time of 4.5s. Our findings suggest that LLM-based testing constitutes a viable approach for the validation of conversational systems regarding their factual correctness. |
| title | Automated Factual Benchmarking for In-Car Conversational Systems using Large Language Models |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Software Engineering |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01248 |