Imagen de Portada

In which fields do ChatGPT scores align better than citations with research quality?

Fuente: arXiv

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Thelwall, Mike
Formato:	Preprint
Publicado:	2025
Materias:	Digital Libraries
Acceso en línea:	Acceder al recurso
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

Ejemplares similares

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2024)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?
por: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021
por: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
por: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

A Global South Strategy for Evaluating Research Value with ChatGPT
por: Nunkoo, Robin, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2024)

Can ChatGPT be a good follower of academic paradigms? Research quality evaluations in conflicting areas of sociology
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
por: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Prompt perturbation and fraction facilitation sometimes strengthen Large Language Model scores
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2025)

Designing large language model prompts to extract scores from messy text: A shared dataset and challenge
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2026)

Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2025)

Will AI be overconfident about academic research findings when reliant on abstracts? (v1)
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2026)

Have LLM-associated terms increased in article full texts in all fields?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2024)

Do Large Language Models know Which Published Articles have been Retracted?
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2026)

Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2025)

Authorship-contribution normalized Sh-index and citations are better research output indicators
por: Karthik, Vishvesh, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Is OpenAlex Suitable for Research Quality Evaluation and Which Citation Indicator is Best?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
por: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?
por: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Predicting citation impact of research papers using GPT and other text embeddings
por: Vital Jr., Adilson, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

FAIR GPT: A virtual consultant for research data management in ChatGPT
por: Shigapov, Renat, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature
por: Gray, Andrew
Publicado: (2024)

Can Small and Reasoning Large Language Models Score Journal Articles for Research Quality and Do Averaging and Few-shot Help?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Can news and social media attention reduce the influence of problematic research?
por: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations
por: Colavizza, Giovanni, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Large Language Models for Departmental Expert Review Quality Scores
por: Langfeldt, Liv, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Which international co-authorships produce higher quality journal articles?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Delving into the Utilisation of ChatGPT in Scientific Publications in Astronomy
por: Astarita, Simone, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?
por: Geng, Mingmeng, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Where there's a will there's a way: ChatGPT is used more for science in countries where it is prohibited
por: Bao, Honglin, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Citation accuracy, citation noise, and citation bias: A foundation of citation analysis
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Sentiment Analysis of Citations in Scientific Articles Using ChatGPT: Identifying Potential Biases and Conflicts of Interest
por: Hariri, Walid
Publicado: (2024)