Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rife, Sean C., Nicholson, Joshua M., Bosques, Beatriz, Rosati, Domenic, Uppala, Ashish, Osipov, Igor A.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05206
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915232168804352
author Rife, Sean C.
Nicholson, Joshua M.
Bosques, Beatriz
Rosati, Domenic
Uppala, Ashish
Osipov, Igor A.
author_facet Rife, Sean C.
Nicholson, Joshua M.
Bosques, Beatriz
Rosati, Domenic
Uppala, Ashish
Osipov, Igor A.
contents Entity rankings (e.g., institutions, journals) are a core component of academia and related industries. Existing approaches to institutional rankings have relied on a variety of data sources, and approaches to computing outcomes, but remain controversial. One limitation of existing approaches is reliance on scholarly output (e.g., number of publications associated with a given institution during a time period). We propose a new approach to rankings - one that relies not on scholarly output, but rather on the type of citations received (an implementation of the Scite Index). We describe how the necessary data can be gathered, as well as how relevant metrics are computed. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we present rankings of fields, journals, and institutions, and discuss the various ways Scite's data can be deployed in the context of rankings. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_05206
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Content-aware rankings: a new approach to rankings in scholarship
Rife, Sean C.
Nicholson, Joshua M.
Bosques, Beatriz
Rosati, Domenic
Uppala, Ashish
Osipov, Igor A.
Digital Libraries
Entity rankings (e.g., institutions, journals) are a core component of academia and related industries. Existing approaches to institutional rankings have relied on a variety of data sources, and approaches to computing outcomes, but remain controversial. One limitation of existing approaches is reliance on scholarly output (e.g., number of publications associated with a given institution during a time period). We propose a new approach to rankings - one that relies not on scholarly output, but rather on the type of citations received (an implementation of the Scite Index). We describe how the necessary data can be gathered, as well as how relevant metrics are computed. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we present rankings of fields, journals, and institutions, and discuss the various ways Scite's data can be deployed in the context of rankings. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
title Content-aware rankings: a new approach to rankings in scholarship
topic Digital Libraries
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05206