Evaluating amyloid-beta as a surrogate endpoint in trials of anti-amyloid drugs in Alzheimer's disease: a Bayesian meta-analysis
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913786043039744 |
|---|---|
| author | Ren, Sa Singh, Janharpreet Gsteiger, Sandro Cogley, Christopher Reed, Ben Abrams, Keith R Dawoud, Dalia Owen, Rhiannon K Tappenden, Paul Quinn, Terrence J Bujkiewicz, Sylwia |
| author_facet | Ren, Sa Singh, Janharpreet Gsteiger, Sandro Cogley, Christopher Reed, Ben Abrams, Keith R Dawoud, Dalia Owen, Rhiannon K Tappenden, Paul Quinn, Terrence J Bujkiewicz, Sylwia |
| contents | The use of amyloid-beta (A$β$) clearance to support regulatory approvals of drugs in Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains controversial. We evaluate A$β$ as a potential trial-level surrogate endpoint for clinical function in AD using a meta-analysis. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on the effectiveness of anti- A$β$ monoclonal antibodies (MABs) on A$β$ and clinical outcomes were identified through a literature review. A Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis was used to evaluate surrogate relationships between the treatment effects on A$β$ and clinical function, with the intercept, slope and variance quantifying the trial level association. The analysis was performed using RCT data both collectively across all MABs and separately for each MAB through subgroup analysis. The latter analysis was extended by applying Bayesian hierarchical models to borrow information across treatments. We identified 23 RCTs with 39 treatment contrasts for seven MABs. The association between treatment effects on A$β$ and Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) across all MABs was strong: with intercept of -0.03 (95% credible intervals: -0.16, 0.11), slope of 1.41 (0.60, 2.21) and variance of 0.02 (0.00, 0.05). For individual treatments, the surrogate relationships were suboptimal, displaying large uncertainty. The use of hierarchical models considerably reduced the uncertainty around key parameters, narrowing the intervals for the slopes by an average of 71% (range: 51%-95%) and for the variances by 28% (7%-65%). Our results suggest that A$β$ is a potential surrogate endpoint for CDR-SOB when assuming a common surrogate relationship across all MABs. When allowing for information-sharing, the surrogate relationships improved, but only for lecanemab and aducanumab was the improvement sufficient to support a surrogate relationship. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_06807 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Evaluating amyloid-beta as a surrogate endpoint in trials of anti-amyloid drugs in Alzheimer's disease: a Bayesian meta-analysis Ren, Sa Singh, Janharpreet Gsteiger, Sandro Cogley, Christopher Reed, Ben Abrams, Keith R Dawoud, Dalia Owen, Rhiannon K Tappenden, Paul Quinn, Terrence J Bujkiewicz, Sylwia Applications The use of amyloid-beta (A$β$) clearance to support regulatory approvals of drugs in Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains controversial. We evaluate A$β$ as a potential trial-level surrogate endpoint for clinical function in AD using a meta-analysis. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on the effectiveness of anti- A$β$ monoclonal antibodies (MABs) on A$β$ and clinical outcomes were identified through a literature review. A Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis was used to evaluate surrogate relationships between the treatment effects on A$β$ and clinical function, with the intercept, slope and variance quantifying the trial level association. The analysis was performed using RCT data both collectively across all MABs and separately for each MAB through subgroup analysis. The latter analysis was extended by applying Bayesian hierarchical models to borrow information across treatments. We identified 23 RCTs with 39 treatment contrasts for seven MABs. The association between treatment effects on A$β$ and Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) across all MABs was strong: with intercept of -0.03 (95% credible intervals: -0.16, 0.11), slope of 1.41 (0.60, 2.21) and variance of 0.02 (0.00, 0.05). For individual treatments, the surrogate relationships were suboptimal, displaying large uncertainty. The use of hierarchical models considerably reduced the uncertainty around key parameters, narrowing the intervals for the slopes by an average of 71% (range: 51%-95%) and for the variances by 28% (7%-65%). Our results suggest that A$β$ is a potential surrogate endpoint for CDR-SOB when assuming a common surrogate relationship across all MABs. When allowing for information-sharing, the surrogate relationships improved, but only for lecanemab and aducanumab was the improvement sufficient to support a surrogate relationship. |
| title | Evaluating amyloid-beta as a surrogate endpoint in trials of anti-amyloid drugs in Alzheimer's disease: a Bayesian meta-analysis |
| topic | Applications |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06807 |