A roadmap for systematic identification and analysis of multiple biases in causal inference
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866912895401459712 |
|---|---|
| author | Wijesuriya, Rushani Hughes, Rachael A. Carlin, John B. Peters, Rachel L. Koplin, Jennifer J. Moreno-Betancur, Margarita |
| author_facet | Wijesuriya, Rushani Hughes, Rachael A. Carlin, John B. Peters, Rachel L. Koplin, Jennifer J. Moreno-Betancur, Margarita |
| contents | Observational studies examining causal effects rely on unverifiable assumptions, the violation of which can induce multiple biases. Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) methods examine the sensitivity of findings to such violations, generally, by producing estimates under alternative assumptions, incorporating external information. Although substantial guidance exists for implementing QBA, there is limited guidance on how to systematically determine the assumptions underlying a primary causal analysis and the potential violations that should guide bias analysis. Consequently, many assumptions remain implicit, leading to selective and therefore misleading QBA. To address this gap, we propose a roadmap for systematically identifying and analysing multiple biases. Briefly, this consists of (1) articulating the assumptions underlying the primary analysis through specification and emulation of the ideal trial that defines the causal estimand and depicting these assumptions using a causal diagram; (2) extending the diagram to depict alternative assumptions under which biases may arise; (3) obtaining a single estimate that simultaneously corrects for all potential biases. We illustrate the roadmap using an investigation of the effect of breastfeeding on risk of childhood asthma, and through simulations illustrate the need for analysing multiple biases jointly rather than one at a time. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_08263 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A roadmap for systematic identification and analysis of multiple biases in causal inference Wijesuriya, Rushani Hughes, Rachael A. Carlin, John B. Peters, Rachel L. Koplin, Jennifer J. Moreno-Betancur, Margarita Methodology Other Statistics Observational studies examining causal effects rely on unverifiable assumptions, the violation of which can induce multiple biases. Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) methods examine the sensitivity of findings to such violations, generally, by producing estimates under alternative assumptions, incorporating external information. Although substantial guidance exists for implementing QBA, there is limited guidance on how to systematically determine the assumptions underlying a primary causal analysis and the potential violations that should guide bias analysis. Consequently, many assumptions remain implicit, leading to selective and therefore misleading QBA. To address this gap, we propose a roadmap for systematically identifying and analysing multiple biases. Briefly, this consists of (1) articulating the assumptions underlying the primary analysis through specification and emulation of the ideal trial that defines the causal estimand and depicting these assumptions using a causal diagram; (2) extending the diagram to depict alternative assumptions under which biases may arise; (3) obtaining a single estimate that simultaneously corrects for all potential biases. We illustrate the roadmap using an investigation of the effect of breastfeeding on risk of childhood asthma, and through simulations illustrate the need for analysing multiple biases jointly rather than one at a time. |
| title | A roadmap for systematic identification and analysis of multiple biases in causal inference |
| topic | Methodology Other Statistics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08263 |