Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alvir, Rachael, Csima, Barbara, Harrison-Trainor, Matthew
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09626
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911250772918272
author Alvir, Rachael
Csima, Barbara
Harrison-Trainor, Matthew
author_facet Alvir, Rachael
Csima, Barbara
Harrison-Trainor, Matthew
contents Given a countable mathematical structure, its Scott sentence is a sentence of the infinitary logic $\mathcal{L}_{ω_1 ω}$ that characterizes it among all countable structures. We can measure the complexity of a structure by the least complexity of a Scott sentence for that structure. It is known that there can be a difference between the least complexity of a Scott sentence and the least complexity of a computable Scott sentence; for example, Alvir, Knight, and McCoy showed that there is a computable structure with a $Π_2$ Scott sentence but no computable $Π_2$ Scott sentence. It is well known that a structure with a $Π_2$ Scott sentence must have a computable $Π_4$ Scott sentence. We show that this is best possible: there is a computable structure with a $Π_2$ Scott sentence but no computable $Σ_4$ Scott sentence. We also show that there is no reasonable characterization of the computable structures with a computable $Π_n$ Scott sentence by showing that the index set of such structures is $Π^1_1$-$m$-complete.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_09626
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On the computability of optimal Scott sentences
Alvir, Rachael
Csima, Barbara
Harrison-Trainor, Matthew
Logic
Given a countable mathematical structure, its Scott sentence is a sentence of the infinitary logic $\mathcal{L}_{ω_1 ω}$ that characterizes it among all countable structures. We can measure the complexity of a structure by the least complexity of a Scott sentence for that structure. It is known that there can be a difference between the least complexity of a Scott sentence and the least complexity of a computable Scott sentence; for example, Alvir, Knight, and McCoy showed that there is a computable structure with a $Π_2$ Scott sentence but no computable $Π_2$ Scott sentence. It is well known that a structure with a $Π_2$ Scott sentence must have a computable $Π_4$ Scott sentence. We show that this is best possible: there is a computable structure with a $Π_2$ Scott sentence but no computable $Σ_4$ Scott sentence. We also show that there is no reasonable characterization of the computable structures with a computable $Π_n$ Scott sentence by showing that the index set of such structures is $Π^1_1$-$m$-complete.
title On the computability of optimal Scott sentences
topic Logic
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09626