Rethinking Theory of Mind Benchmarks for LLMs: Towards A User-Centered Perspective

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Qiaosi, Zhou, Xuhui, Sap, Maarten, Forlizzi, Jodi, Shen, Hong
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917986077507584
author Wang, Qiaosi
Zhou, Xuhui
Sap, Maarten
Forlizzi, Jodi
Shen, Hong
author_facet Wang, Qiaosi
Zhou, Xuhui
Sap, Maarten
Forlizzi, Jodi
Shen, Hong
contents The last couple of years have witnessed emerging research that appropriates Theory-of-Mind (ToM) tasks designed for humans to benchmark LLM's ToM capabilities as an indication of LLM's social intelligence. However, this approach has a number of limitations. Drawing on existing psychology and AI literature, we summarize the theoretical, methodological, and evaluation limitations by pointing out that certain issues are inherently present in the original ToM tasks used to evaluate human's ToM, which continues to persist and exacerbated when appropriated to benchmark LLM's ToM. Taking a human-computer interaction (HCI) perspective, these limitations prompt us to rethink the definition and criteria of ToM in ToM benchmarks in a more dynamic, interactional approach that accounts for user preferences, needs, and experiences with LLMs in such evaluations. We conclude by outlining potential opportunities and challenges towards this direction.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_10839
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Rethinking Theory of Mind Benchmarks for LLMs: Towards A User-Centered Perspective
Wang, Qiaosi
Zhou, Xuhui
Sap, Maarten
Forlizzi, Jodi
Shen, Hong
Human-Computer Interaction
Artificial Intelligence
The last couple of years have witnessed emerging research that appropriates Theory-of-Mind (ToM) tasks designed for humans to benchmark LLM's ToM capabilities as an indication of LLM's social intelligence. However, this approach has a number of limitations. Drawing on existing psychology and AI literature, we summarize the theoretical, methodological, and evaluation limitations by pointing out that certain issues are inherently present in the original ToM tasks used to evaluate human's ToM, which continues to persist and exacerbated when appropriated to benchmark LLM's ToM. Taking a human-computer interaction (HCI) perspective, these limitations prompt us to rethink the definition and criteria of ToM in ToM benchmarks in a more dynamic, interactional approach that accounts for user preferences, needs, and experiences with LLMs in such evaluations. We conclude by outlining potential opportunities and challenges towards this direction.
title Rethinking Theory of Mind Benchmarks for LLMs: Towards A User-Centered Perspective
topic Human-Computer Interaction
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10839