Exploring Persona-dependent LLM Alignment for the Moral Machine Experiment
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866913794868903936 |
|---|---|
| author | Kim, Jiseon Kwon, Jea Vecchietti, Luiz Felipe Oh, Alice Cha, Meeyoung |
| author_facet | Kim, Jiseon Kwon, Jea Vecchietti, Luiz Felipe Oh, Alice Cha, Meeyoung |
| contents | Deploying large language models (LLMs) with agency in real-world applications raises critical questions about how these models will behave. In particular, how will their decisions align with humans when faced with moral dilemmas? This study examines the alignment between LLM-driven decisions and human judgment in various contexts of the moral machine experiment, including personas reflecting different sociodemographics. We find that the moral decisions of LLMs vary substantially by persona, showing greater shifts in moral decisions for critical tasks than humans. Our data also indicate an interesting partisan sorting phenomenon, where political persona predominates the direction and degree of LLM decisions. We discuss the ethical implications and risks associated with deploying these models in applications that involve moral decisions. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_10886 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Exploring Persona-dependent LLM Alignment for the Moral Machine Experiment Kim, Jiseon Kwon, Jea Vecchietti, Luiz Felipe Oh, Alice Cha, Meeyoung Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Deploying large language models (LLMs) with agency in real-world applications raises critical questions about how these models will behave. In particular, how will their decisions align with humans when faced with moral dilemmas? This study examines the alignment between LLM-driven decisions and human judgment in various contexts of the moral machine experiment, including personas reflecting different sociodemographics. We find that the moral decisions of LLMs vary substantially by persona, showing greater shifts in moral decisions for critical tasks than humans. Our data also indicate an interesting partisan sorting phenomenon, where political persona predominates the direction and degree of LLM decisions. We discuss the ethical implications and risks associated with deploying these models in applications that involve moral decisions. |
| title | Exploring Persona-dependent LLM Alignment for the Moral Machine Experiment |
| topic | Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10886 |