Differentiating Formation Models with New Dynamical Masses for the PDS 70 Protoplanets

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Trevascus, David, Blunt, Sarah, Christiaens, Valentin, Matthews, Elisabeth, Hammond, Iain, Brandner, Wolfgang, Wang, Jason, Lacour, Sylvestre, Vigan, Arthur, Balmer, William O., Bonnefoy, Mickael, Burn, Remo, Chauvin, Gaël, Gratton, Raffaele, Houllé, Mathis, Hinkley, Sasha, Kammerer, Jens, Kreidberg, Laura, Marleau, Gabriel-Dominique, Mesa, Dino, Otten, Gilles, Nowak, Mathias, Rickman, Emily, Sanchez-Bermudez, Joel, Sauter, Jonas
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866916761430917120
author Trevascus, David
Blunt, Sarah
Christiaens, Valentin
Matthews, Elisabeth
Hammond, Iain
Brandner, Wolfgang
Wang, Jason
Lacour, Sylvestre
Vigan, Arthur
Balmer, William O.
Bonnefoy, Mickael
Burn, Remo
Chauvin, Gaël
Gratton, Raffaele
Houllé, Mathis
Hinkley, Sasha
Kammerer, Jens
Kreidberg, Laura
Marleau, Gabriel-Dominique
Mesa, Dino
Otten, Gilles
Nowak, Mathias
Rickman, Emily
Sanchez-Bermudez, Joel
Sauter, Jonas
author_facet Trevascus, David
Blunt, Sarah
Christiaens, Valentin
Matthews, Elisabeth
Hammond, Iain
Brandner, Wolfgang
Wang, Jason
Lacour, Sylvestre
Vigan, Arthur
Balmer, William O.
Bonnefoy, Mickael
Burn, Remo
Chauvin, Gaël
Gratton, Raffaele
Houllé, Mathis
Hinkley, Sasha
Kammerer, Jens
Kreidberg, Laura
Marleau, Gabriel-Dominique
Mesa, Dino
Otten, Gilles
Nowak, Mathias
Rickman, Emily
Sanchez-Bermudez, Joel
Sauter, Jonas
contents Hot- and cold-start planet formation models predict differing luminosities for the young, bright planets that direct imaging surveys are most sensitive to. However, precise mass estimates are required to distinguish between these models observationally. The presence of two directly imaged planets, PDS 70 b and c, in the PDS 70 protoplanetary disk provides us a unique opportunity for dynamical mass measurements, since the masses for these planets are currently poorly constrained. Fitting orbital parameters to new astrometry of these planets, taken with VLTI/GRAVITY in the $K$~band, we find $2σ$ dynamical upper mass limits of 4.9 $M_{\rm Jup}$ for b and 13.6 $M_{\rm Jup}$ for c. Adding astrometry from the newly proposed planet candidate PDS 70 d into our model, we determine $2σ$ dynamical upper mass limits of 5.3 $M_{\rm Jup}$, 7.5 $M_{\rm Jup}$ and 2.2 $M_{\rm Jup}$ for b, c, and the candidate d respectively. However, $N$-body analysis of the orbits fit in this case suggest that the inclusion of $d$ makes the system unstable. Using the upper mass limits for b and c we rule out the coldest-start formation models for both planets, calculating minimum post-formation entropies ($S_i$) of 9.5 $k_{\rm B}/{\rm baryon}$ and 8.4 $k_{\rm B}/{\rm baryon}$ respectively. This places PDS 70 b and c on the growing list of directly-imaged planets inconsistent with cold-start formation.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_11210
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Differentiating Formation Models with New Dynamical Masses for the PDS 70 Protoplanets
Trevascus, David
Blunt, Sarah
Christiaens, Valentin
Matthews, Elisabeth
Hammond, Iain
Brandner, Wolfgang
Wang, Jason
Lacour, Sylvestre
Vigan, Arthur
Balmer, William O.
Bonnefoy, Mickael
Burn, Remo
Chauvin, Gaël
Gratton, Raffaele
Houllé, Mathis
Hinkley, Sasha
Kammerer, Jens
Kreidberg, Laura
Marleau, Gabriel-Dominique
Mesa, Dino
Otten, Gilles
Nowak, Mathias
Rickman, Emily
Sanchez-Bermudez, Joel
Sauter, Jonas
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Hot- and cold-start planet formation models predict differing luminosities for the young, bright planets that direct imaging surveys are most sensitive to. However, precise mass estimates are required to distinguish between these models observationally. The presence of two directly imaged planets, PDS 70 b and c, in the PDS 70 protoplanetary disk provides us a unique opportunity for dynamical mass measurements, since the masses for these planets are currently poorly constrained. Fitting orbital parameters to new astrometry of these planets, taken with VLTI/GRAVITY in the $K$~band, we find $2σ$ dynamical upper mass limits of 4.9 $M_{\rm Jup}$ for b and 13.6 $M_{\rm Jup}$ for c. Adding astrometry from the newly proposed planet candidate PDS 70 d into our model, we determine $2σ$ dynamical upper mass limits of 5.3 $M_{\rm Jup}$, 7.5 $M_{\rm Jup}$ and 2.2 $M_{\rm Jup}$ for b, c, and the candidate d respectively. However, $N$-body analysis of the orbits fit in this case suggest that the inclusion of $d$ makes the system unstable. Using the upper mass limits for b and c we rule out the coldest-start formation models for both planets, calculating minimum post-formation entropies ($S_i$) of 9.5 $k_{\rm B}/{\rm baryon}$ and 8.4 $k_{\rm B}/{\rm baryon}$ respectively. This places PDS 70 b and c on the growing list of directly-imaged planets inconsistent with cold-start formation.
title Differentiating Formation Models with New Dynamical Masses for the PDS 70 Protoplanets
topic Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11210