How Much is Enough? An Empirical Test of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915244216942592 |
|---|---|
| author | Biswas, Sourabh Ghosh, Kalyan Touhid, Sumedha Nandi, Srijaya Bhattacharyya, Arpan Bhattacharyya, Arunima Das, Milisha Paul, Raktim Bhadra, Anindita |
| author_facet | Biswas, Sourabh Ghosh, Kalyan Touhid, Sumedha Nandi, Srijaya Bhattacharyya, Arpan Bhattacharyya, Arunima Das, Milisha Paul, Raktim Bhadra, Anindita |
| contents | Free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) thrive in diverse landscapes, including those heavily modified by humans. This study investigated the influence of resource availability on their spatial ecology across 52 rural and 41 urban sites, comparing urban and rural environments. Census-based surveys were conducted to understand the distribution of dogs and resources, while territory-based observations were carried out across different seasons to capture temporal variability in dog populations and resource availability. Dog and resource density were significantly higher in urban areas, supporting the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis (RDH). Territory size (TS) varied seasonally, decreasing significantly (by 21%) post-mating, likely reflecting shifts in resource demands and distribution. TS was positively correlated with resource heterogeneity, dispersion, patch richness, and male-to-female ratio, but not with group size, which remained stable across seasons and resource gradients. This suggests that while resource availability and sex ratio influence space use, social factors play a key role in shaping group dynamics. These findings highlight the complex interplay between resource availability, social behaviour, and human influences in shaping the spatial ecology of free-ranging dogs and have important implications for their management and disease control, informing targeted interventions such as spay/neuter programs and responsible waste management in both urban and rural landscapes. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_11557 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | How Much is Enough? An Empirical Test of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis Biswas, Sourabh Ghosh, Kalyan Touhid, Sumedha Nandi, Srijaya Bhattacharyya, Arpan Bhattacharyya, Arunima Das, Milisha Paul, Raktim Bhadra, Anindita Populations and Evolution Free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) thrive in diverse landscapes, including those heavily modified by humans. This study investigated the influence of resource availability on their spatial ecology across 52 rural and 41 urban sites, comparing urban and rural environments. Census-based surveys were conducted to understand the distribution of dogs and resources, while territory-based observations were carried out across different seasons to capture temporal variability in dog populations and resource availability. Dog and resource density were significantly higher in urban areas, supporting the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis (RDH). Territory size (TS) varied seasonally, decreasing significantly (by 21%) post-mating, likely reflecting shifts in resource demands and distribution. TS was positively correlated with resource heterogeneity, dispersion, patch richness, and male-to-female ratio, but not with group size, which remained stable across seasons and resource gradients. This suggests that while resource availability and sex ratio influence space use, social factors play a key role in shaping group dynamics. These findings highlight the complex interplay between resource availability, social behaviour, and human influences in shaping the spatial ecology of free-ranging dogs and have important implications for their management and disease control, informing targeted interventions such as spay/neuter programs and responsible waste management in both urban and rural landscapes. |
| title | How Much is Enough? An Empirical Test of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis |
| topic | Populations and Evolution |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11557 |