A Comparative Evaluation of CT Global Noise Calculation Methods for Clinical Image Quality Assessment
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866912330625843200 |
|---|---|
| author | Weaver, Charles M Ge, Gary Alsalihi, Alexander Zhang, Jie |
| author_facet | Weaver, Charles M Ge, Gary Alsalihi, Alexander Zhang, Jie |
| contents | The CMS quality measure for CT mandates compliance with dose and image quality across 18 exam categories, yet the method for calculating global noise (GN) remains undefined, referencing only the Duke and Wisconsin methods. This ambiguity raises concerns about standardization and clinical applicability. We retrospectively analyzed 719 CT exams across seven protocols, comparing five GN metrics derived from the Duke and Wisconsin approaches. Results showed significant variability across metrics and protocols, with Wisconsin_tissue_mean consistently yielding the highest values. Correlation strength varied by protocol, and mode-based metrics demonstrated higher agreement, suggesting dose dependence. In the Chest PE protocol, GN values differed significantly based on reconstruction kernel. These findings underscore the need for a standardized, clinically meaningful GN metric to ensure consistent image quality evaluation and effective implementation of the CMS measure. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_11578 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Comparative Evaluation of CT Global Noise Calculation Methods for Clinical Image Quality Assessment Weaver, Charles M Ge, Gary Alsalihi, Alexander Zhang, Jie Medical Physics The CMS quality measure for CT mandates compliance with dose and image quality across 18 exam categories, yet the method for calculating global noise (GN) remains undefined, referencing only the Duke and Wisconsin methods. This ambiguity raises concerns about standardization and clinical applicability. We retrospectively analyzed 719 CT exams across seven protocols, comparing five GN metrics derived from the Duke and Wisconsin approaches. Results showed significant variability across metrics and protocols, with Wisconsin_tissue_mean consistently yielding the highest values. Correlation strength varied by protocol, and mode-based metrics demonstrated higher agreement, suggesting dose dependence. In the Chest PE protocol, GN values differed significantly based on reconstruction kernel. These findings underscore the need for a standardized, clinically meaningful GN metric to ensure consistent image quality evaluation and effective implementation of the CMS measure. |
| title | A Comparative Evaluation of CT Global Noise Calculation Methods for Clinical Image Quality Assessment |
| topic | Medical Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11578 |