Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12536 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915247488499712 |
|---|---|
| author | Kelso, Easton Soneji, Ananta Navid, Syed Zami-Ul-Haque Soshitaishvili, Yan Rahaman, Sazzadur Hasan, Rakibul |
| author_facet | Kelso, Easton Soneji, Ananta Navid, Syed Zami-Ul-Haque Soshitaishvili, Yan Rahaman, Sazzadur Hasan, Rakibul |
| contents | Educators regularly use unsanctioned technologies (apps not formally approved by their institutions) for teaching, grading, and other academic tasks. While these tools often support instructional needs, they raise significant privacy, security, and regulatory compliance concerns. Despite its importance, understanding the adoptions and risks from the perspective of educators, who serve as de facto decision makers behind unsanctioned technology use, is largely understudied in existing literature.To address this gap, we conducted two surveys: one with 375 educators who listed 1,373 unsanctioned apps, and another with 21 administrators who either often help educators to set up educational technologies (EdTechs) or observe their security or privacy incidents. Our study identified 494 unique applications used by educators, primarily for pedagogical utility (n=213) and functional convenience (n=155), and the associated risks were often ignored. In fact, despite security and privacy concerns, many educators continued using the same apps (n = 62), citing a lack of alternatives or heavy dependence as barriers to discontinuation. We also found that fewer than a third of educators were aware of any institutional policy on unsanctioned technology use (K12: 30.3%, HEI: 24.8%), and 22 knowingly violated such policies. While 107 received formal warnings, only 33 adjusted their behavior. Finally, we conclude by discussing the implications of our findings and future recommendations to minimize the risks. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_12536 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | "It's not approved, but many, like myself, ignore the rule": Investigating the Landscape and Consequences of Unsanctioned Technology Use in Educational Institutes Kelso, Easton Soneji, Ananta Navid, Syed Zami-Ul-Haque Soshitaishvili, Yan Rahaman, Sazzadur Hasan, Rakibul Computers and Society Educators regularly use unsanctioned technologies (apps not formally approved by their institutions) for teaching, grading, and other academic tasks. While these tools often support instructional needs, they raise significant privacy, security, and regulatory compliance concerns. Despite its importance, understanding the adoptions and risks from the perspective of educators, who serve as de facto decision makers behind unsanctioned technology use, is largely understudied in existing literature.To address this gap, we conducted two surveys: one with 375 educators who listed 1,373 unsanctioned apps, and another with 21 administrators who either often help educators to set up educational technologies (EdTechs) or observe their security or privacy incidents. Our study identified 494 unique applications used by educators, primarily for pedagogical utility (n=213) and functional convenience (n=155), and the associated risks were often ignored. In fact, despite security and privacy concerns, many educators continued using the same apps (n = 62), citing a lack of alternatives or heavy dependence as barriers to discontinuation. We also found that fewer than a third of educators were aware of any institutional policy on unsanctioned technology use (K12: 30.3%, HEI: 24.8%), and 22 knowingly violated such policies. While 107 received formal warnings, only 33 adjusted their behavior. Finally, we conclude by discussing the implications of our findings and future recommendations to minimize the risks. |
| title | "It's not approved, but many, like myself, ignore the rule": Investigating the Landscape and Consequences of Unsanctioned Technology Use in Educational Institutes |
| topic | Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12536 |