Robust Covariate Adjustment in Multi-Center Randomized Trials
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866914386539446272 |
|---|---|
| author | Alene, Muluneh Vansteelandt, Stijn Van Lancker, Kelly |
| author_facet | Alene, Muluneh Vansteelandt, Stijn Van Lancker, Kelly |
| contents | Augmented inverse probability weighting and G-computation with canonical generalized linear models have become increasingly popular for estimating average treatment effects (ATEs) in randomized experiments. These methods leverage outcome prediction models to adjust for imbalances in baseline covariates across treatment arms, improving power compared to unadjusted analyses, while controlling Type I error, even when models are misspecified. In multi-center trials they are often implemented without accounting for clustering by centers. We investigate how ignoring center-level correlation can impair estimation, degrade coverage of confidence intervals, and obscure interpretation. We find these issues to be especially acute for estimators of counterfactual means, as shown through simulations and clarified via theoretical arguments. To address these challenges, we develop semiparametric efficient estimators of counterfactual means and ATE defined for a randomly sampled center and patient. These estimators leverage outcome prediction models to improve efficiency yet retain large-sample unbiasedness under model misspecification. We further introduce an inference framework, inspired by random-effects meta-analysis, tailored to settings with many small centers. Incorporating center effects into the prediction models yields substantial efficiency gains, particularly when treatment effects vary across centers. Simulations and application to the WASH Benefits Bangladesh trial illustrate strong finite-sample performance of the proposed methods. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_12760 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Robust Covariate Adjustment in Multi-Center Randomized Trials Alene, Muluneh Vansteelandt, Stijn Van Lancker, Kelly Methodology Augmented inverse probability weighting and G-computation with canonical generalized linear models have become increasingly popular for estimating average treatment effects (ATEs) in randomized experiments. These methods leverage outcome prediction models to adjust for imbalances in baseline covariates across treatment arms, improving power compared to unadjusted analyses, while controlling Type I error, even when models are misspecified. In multi-center trials they are often implemented without accounting for clustering by centers. We investigate how ignoring center-level correlation can impair estimation, degrade coverage of confidence intervals, and obscure interpretation. We find these issues to be especially acute for estimators of counterfactual means, as shown through simulations and clarified via theoretical arguments. To address these challenges, we develop semiparametric efficient estimators of counterfactual means and ATE defined for a randomly sampled center and patient. These estimators leverage outcome prediction models to improve efficiency yet retain large-sample unbiasedness under model misspecification. We further introduce an inference framework, inspired by random-effects meta-analysis, tailored to settings with many small centers. Incorporating center effects into the prediction models yields substantial efficiency gains, particularly when treatment effects vary across centers. Simulations and application to the WASH Benefits Bangladesh trial illustrate strong finite-sample performance of the proposed methods. |
| title | Robust Covariate Adjustment in Multi-Center Randomized Trials |
| topic | Methodology |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12760 |