Prejudge-Before-Think: Enhancing Large Language Models at Test-Time by Process Prejudge Reasoning

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Jianing, Jiang, Jin, Liu, Yang, Zhang, Mengdi, Cai, Xunliang
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912334052589568
author Wang, Jianing
Jiang, Jin
Liu, Yang
Zhang, Mengdi
Cai, Xunliang
author_facet Wang, Jianing
Jiang, Jin
Liu, Yang
Zhang, Mengdi
Cai, Xunliang
contents In this paper, we introduce a new \emph{process prejudge} strategy in LLM reasoning to demonstrate that bootstrapping with process prejudge allows the LLM to adaptively anticipate the errors encountered when advancing the subsequent reasoning steps, similar to people sometimes pausing to think about what mistakes may occur and how to avoid them, rather than relying solely on trial and error. Specifically, we define a prejudge node in the rationale, which represents a reasoning step, with at least one step that follows the prejudge node that has no paths toward the correct answer. To synthesize the prejudge reasoning process, we present an automated reasoning framework with a dynamic tree-searching strategy. This framework requires only one LLM to perform answer judging, response critiquing, prejudge generation, and thought completion. Furthermore, we develop a two-phase training mechanism with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) to further enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Experimental results from competition-level complex reasoning demonstrate that our method can teach the model to prejudge before thinking and significantly enhance the reasoning ability of LLMs. Code and data is released at https://github.com/wjn1996/Prejudge-Before-Think.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_13500
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Prejudge-Before-Think: Enhancing Large Language Models at Test-Time by Process Prejudge Reasoning
Wang, Jianing
Jiang, Jin
Liu, Yang
Zhang, Mengdi
Cai, Xunliang
Computation and Language
In this paper, we introduce a new \emph{process prejudge} strategy in LLM reasoning to demonstrate that bootstrapping with process prejudge allows the LLM to adaptively anticipate the errors encountered when advancing the subsequent reasoning steps, similar to people sometimes pausing to think about what mistakes may occur and how to avoid them, rather than relying solely on trial and error. Specifically, we define a prejudge node in the rationale, which represents a reasoning step, with at least one step that follows the prejudge node that has no paths toward the correct answer. To synthesize the prejudge reasoning process, we present an automated reasoning framework with a dynamic tree-searching strategy. This framework requires only one LLM to perform answer judging, response critiquing, prejudge generation, and thought completion. Furthermore, we develop a two-phase training mechanism with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) to further enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Experimental results from competition-level complex reasoning demonstrate that our method can teach the model to prejudge before thinking and significantly enhance the reasoning ability of LLMs. Code and data is released at https://github.com/wjn1996/Prejudge-Before-Think.
title Prejudge-Before-Think: Enhancing Large Language Models at Test-Time by Process Prejudge Reasoning
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13500