Meta-Thinking in LLMs via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Survey

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Bilal, Ahsan, Mohsin, Muhammad Ahmed, Umer, Muhammad, Bangash, Muhammad Awais Khan, Jamshed, Muhammad Ali
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866910915230695424
author Bilal, Ahsan
Mohsin, Muhammad Ahmed
Umer, Muhammad
Bangash, Muhammad Awais Khan
Jamshed, Muhammad Ali
author_facet Bilal, Ahsan
Mohsin, Muhammad Ahmed
Umer, Muhammad
Bangash, Muhammad Awais Khan
Jamshed, Muhammad Ali
contents This survey explores the development of meta-thinking capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) from a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) perspective. Meta-thinking self-reflection, assessment, and control of thinking processes is an important next step in enhancing LLM reliability, flexibility, and performance, particularly for complex or high-stakes tasks. The survey begins by analyzing current LLM limitations, such as hallucinations and the lack of internal self-assessment mechanisms. It then talks about newer methods, including RL from human feedback (RLHF), self-distillation, and chain-of-thought prompting, and each of their limitations. The crux of the survey is to talk about how multi-agent architectures, namely supervisor-agent hierarchies, agent debates, and theory of mind frameworks, can emulate human-like introspective behavior and enhance LLM robustness. By exploring reward mechanisms, self-play, and continuous learning methods in MARL, this survey gives a comprehensive roadmap to building introspective, adaptive, and trustworthy LLMs. Evaluation metrics, datasets, and future research avenues, including neuroscience-inspired architectures and hybrid symbolic reasoning, are also discussed.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_14520
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Meta-Thinking in LLMs via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
Bilal, Ahsan
Mohsin, Muhammad Ahmed
Umer, Muhammad
Bangash, Muhammad Awais Khan
Jamshed, Muhammad Ali
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
This survey explores the development of meta-thinking capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) from a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) perspective. Meta-thinking self-reflection, assessment, and control of thinking processes is an important next step in enhancing LLM reliability, flexibility, and performance, particularly for complex or high-stakes tasks. The survey begins by analyzing current LLM limitations, such as hallucinations and the lack of internal self-assessment mechanisms. It then talks about newer methods, including RL from human feedback (RLHF), self-distillation, and chain-of-thought prompting, and each of their limitations. The crux of the survey is to talk about how multi-agent architectures, namely supervisor-agent hierarchies, agent debates, and theory of mind frameworks, can emulate human-like introspective behavior and enhance LLM robustness. By exploring reward mechanisms, self-play, and continuous learning methods in MARL, this survey gives a comprehensive roadmap to building introspective, adaptive, and trustworthy LLMs. Evaluation metrics, datasets, and future research avenues, including neuroscience-inspired architectures and hybrid symbolic reasoning, are also discussed.
title Meta-Thinking in LLMs via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14520