Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14624 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911122366398464 |
|---|---|
| author | Gordienko, Polina Jansen, Christoph Augustin, Thomas Rechenauer, Martin |
| author_facet | Gordienko, Polina Jansen, Christoph Augustin, Thomas Rechenauer, Martin |
| contents | We propose a framework for probability aggregation based on propositional probability logic. Unlike conventional judgment aggregation, which focuses on static rationality, our model addresses dynamic rationality by ensuring that collective beliefs update consistently with new information. We show that any consensus-compatible and independent aggregation rule on a non-nested agenda is necessarily linear. Furthermore, we provide sufficient conditions for a fair learning process, where individuals initially agree on a specified subset of propositions known as the common ground, and new information is restricted to this shared foundation. This guarantees that updating individual judgments via Bayesian conditioning-whether performed before or after aggregation-yields the same collective belief. A distinctive feature of our framework is its treatment of sequential decision-making, which allows new information to be incorporated progressively through multiple stages while maintaining the established common ground. We illustrate our findings with a running example in a political scenario concerning healthcare and immigration policies. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_14624 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Consensus in Motion: A Case of Dynamic Rationality of Sequential Learning in Probability Aggregation Gordienko, Polina Jansen, Christoph Augustin, Thomas Rechenauer, Martin Artificial Intelligence We propose a framework for probability aggregation based on propositional probability logic. Unlike conventional judgment aggregation, which focuses on static rationality, our model addresses dynamic rationality by ensuring that collective beliefs update consistently with new information. We show that any consensus-compatible and independent aggregation rule on a non-nested agenda is necessarily linear. Furthermore, we provide sufficient conditions for a fair learning process, where individuals initially agree on a specified subset of propositions known as the common ground, and new information is restricted to this shared foundation. This guarantees that updating individual judgments via Bayesian conditioning-whether performed before or after aggregation-yields the same collective belief. A distinctive feature of our framework is its treatment of sequential decision-making, which allows new information to be incorporated progressively through multiple stages while maintaining the established common ground. We illustrate our findings with a running example in a political scenario concerning healthcare and immigration policies. |
| title | Consensus in Motion: A Case of Dynamic Rationality of Sequential Learning in Probability Aggregation |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14624 |