VeriFix: Verifying Your Fix Towards An Atomicity Violation
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916702908841984 |
|---|---|
| author | Li, Zhuang Yi, Qiuping Huang, Jeff |
| author_facet | Li, Zhuang Yi, Qiuping Huang, Jeff |
| contents | Atomicity violation is one of the most serious types of bugs in concurrent programs. Synchronizations are commonly used to enforce atomicity. However, it is very challenging to place synchronizations correctly and sufficiently
due to complex thread interactions and large input space. This paper presents \textsf{VeriFix}, a new approach for verifying atomicity violation fixes. Given a buggy trace that exposes an atomicity violation and a corresponding fix, % in the form of locks, \textsf{VeriFix} effectively verifies if the fix introduces sufficient synchronizations to repair the atomicity violation without introducing new deadlocks. The key idea is that \textsf{VeriFix} transforms the fix verification problem into a property verification problem, in which both the observed atomicity violation and potential deadlocks are encoded as a safety property, and both the inputs and schedules are encoded as symbolic constraints. By reasoning the conjoined constraints with an SMT solver, \textsf{VeriFix} systematically explores all reachable paths %from the whole schedule and input space and verifies if there exists a concrete \textit{schedule+input} combination to manifest the intended atomicity or any new deadlocks. We have implemented and evaluated \verifix\ on a collection of real-world C/C++ programs. The result shows that \textsf{VeriFix} significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_16354 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | VeriFix: Verifying Your Fix Towards An Atomicity Violation Li, Zhuang Yi, Qiuping Huang, Jeff Software Engineering Atomicity violation is one of the most serious types of bugs in concurrent programs. Synchronizations are commonly used to enforce atomicity. However, it is very challenging to place synchronizations correctly and sufficiently due to complex thread interactions and large input space. This paper presents \textsf{VeriFix}, a new approach for verifying atomicity violation fixes. Given a buggy trace that exposes an atomicity violation and a corresponding fix, % in the form of locks, \textsf{VeriFix} effectively verifies if the fix introduces sufficient synchronizations to repair the atomicity violation without introducing new deadlocks. The key idea is that \textsf{VeriFix} transforms the fix verification problem into a property verification problem, in which both the observed atomicity violation and potential deadlocks are encoded as a safety property, and both the inputs and schedules are encoded as symbolic constraints. By reasoning the conjoined constraints with an SMT solver, \textsf{VeriFix} systematically explores all reachable paths %from the whole schedule and input space and verifies if there exists a concrete \textit{schedule+input} combination to manifest the intended atomicity or any new deadlocks. We have implemented and evaluated \verifix\ on a collection of real-world C/C++ programs. The result shows that \textsf{VeriFix} significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art. |
| title | VeriFix: Verifying Your Fix Towards An Atomicity Violation |
| topic | Software Engineering |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16354 |