Evaluating Argon2 Adoption and Effectiveness in Real-World Software
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917049731645440 |
|---|---|
| author | Tippe, Pascal Berner, Michael P. |
| author_facet | Tippe, Pascal Berner, Michael P. |
| contents | Modern password hashing remains a critical defense against credential cracking, yet the transition from theoretically secure algorithms to robust real-world implementations remains fraught with challenges. This paper presents a dual analysis of Argon2, the Password Hashing Competition winner, combining attack simulations quantifying how parameter configurations impact guessing costs under realistic budgets, with the first large-scale empirical study of Argon2 adoption across public GitHub software repositories. Our economic model, validated against cryptocurrency mining benchmarks, demonstrates that OWASP's recommended 46 MiB configuration reduces compromise rates by 42.5% compared to SHA-256 at \$1/account attack budgets for strong user passwords. However, memory-hardness exhibits diminishing returns as increasing allocations to RFC 9106's 2048 MiB provides just 23.3% (\$1) and 17.7% (\$20) additional protection despite 44.5 times greater memory demands. Crucially, both configurations fail to mitigate risks from weak passwords, with 96.9-99.8% compromise rates for RockYou-like credentials regardless of algorithm choice. Our repository analysis shows accelerating Argon2 adoption, yet weak configuration practices: 46.6% of deployments use weaker-than-OWASP parameters. Surprisingly, sensitive applications (password managers, encryption tools) show no stronger configurations than general software. Our findings highlight that a secure algorithm alone cannot ensure security, effective parameter guidance and developer education remain essential for realizing Argon2's theoretical advantages. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_17121 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Evaluating Argon2 Adoption and Effectiveness in Real-World Software Tippe, Pascal Berner, Michael P. Cryptography and Security 94A62, 94A60, 68P25 K.6.5; D.4.6 Modern password hashing remains a critical defense against credential cracking, yet the transition from theoretically secure algorithms to robust real-world implementations remains fraught with challenges. This paper presents a dual analysis of Argon2, the Password Hashing Competition winner, combining attack simulations quantifying how parameter configurations impact guessing costs under realistic budgets, with the first large-scale empirical study of Argon2 adoption across public GitHub software repositories. Our economic model, validated against cryptocurrency mining benchmarks, demonstrates that OWASP's recommended 46 MiB configuration reduces compromise rates by 42.5% compared to SHA-256 at \$1/account attack budgets for strong user passwords. However, memory-hardness exhibits diminishing returns as increasing allocations to RFC 9106's 2048 MiB provides just 23.3% (\$1) and 17.7% (\$20) additional protection despite 44.5 times greater memory demands. Crucially, both configurations fail to mitigate risks from weak passwords, with 96.9-99.8% compromise rates for RockYou-like credentials regardless of algorithm choice. Our repository analysis shows accelerating Argon2 adoption, yet weak configuration practices: 46.6% of deployments use weaker-than-OWASP parameters. Surprisingly, sensitive applications (password managers, encryption tools) show no stronger configurations than general software. Our findings highlight that a secure algorithm alone cannot ensure security, effective parameter guidance and developer education remain essential for realizing Argon2's theoretical advantages. |
| title | Evaluating Argon2 Adoption and Effectiveness in Real-World Software |
| topic | Cryptography and Security 94A62, 94A60, 68P25 K.6.5; D.4.6 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17121 |