Effect of Electrode Array Position on Electric Field Intensity in Glioblastoma Patients Undergoing Electric Field Therapy

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ko, Yousun, Kim, Sangcheol, Kim, Tae Hyun, Shin, Dongho, Kim, Haksoo, Lee, Sung Uk, Kim, Jonghyun, Yoon, Myonggeun
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916705418084352
author Ko, Yousun
Kim, Sangcheol
Kim, Tae Hyun
Shin, Dongho
Kim, Haksoo
Lee, Sung Uk
Kim, Jonghyun
Yoon, Myonggeun
author_facet Ko, Yousun
Kim, Sangcheol
Kim, Tae Hyun
Shin, Dongho
Kim, Haksoo
Lee, Sung Uk
Kim, Jonghyun
Yoon, Myonggeun
contents Background: The intensity of the electric field applied to a brain tumor by electric field therapy is influenced by the position of the electrode array, which should be optimized based on the patient's head shape and tumor characteristics. This study assessed the effects of varying electrode positions on electric field intensity in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. Methods: This study enrolled 13 GBM patients. The center of the MR slice corresponding to the center of the tumor was set as the reference point for the electrodes, creating pairs of electrode arrays in the top-rear and left-right positions. Based on this reference plan, four additional treatment plans were generated by rotating three of the four electrode arrays, all except the top electrode array, by 15$^\circ$ and 30$^\circ$ from their reference positions, resulting in a total of five treatment plans per patient. Electric field frequency was set at 200 kHz, and current density at 31 mArms/cm$^2$. The minimum and mean electric field intensities, homogeneity index (HI), and coverage index (CovI) were calculated and compared. Results: The optimal plans showed differences ranging from-0.39% to 24.20% for minimum intensity and -14.29% to 16.67% for mean intensity compared to reference plans. HI and CovI varied from 0.00% to 48.65% and 0.00% to 95.3%, respectively. The average improvements across all patients were 8.96% for minimum intensity, 5.11% for mean intensity, 15.65% for HI, and 17.84% for CovI. Conclusions: Optimizing electrode angle improves electric field therapy outcomes in GBM patients by maximizing field intensity and coverage. Keywords: electric field therapy; glioblastoma multiforme (GBM); treatment planning system (TPS); electrode array position; tumor coverage
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_17183
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Effect of Electrode Array Position on Electric Field Intensity in Glioblastoma Patients Undergoing Electric Field Therapy
Ko, Yousun
Kim, Sangcheol
Kim, Tae Hyun
Shin, Dongho
Kim, Haksoo
Lee, Sung Uk
Kim, Jonghyun
Yoon, Myonggeun
Medical Physics
Background: The intensity of the electric field applied to a brain tumor by electric field therapy is influenced by the position of the electrode array, which should be optimized based on the patient's head shape and tumor characteristics. This study assessed the effects of varying electrode positions on electric field intensity in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. Methods: This study enrolled 13 GBM patients. The center of the MR slice corresponding to the center of the tumor was set as the reference point for the electrodes, creating pairs of electrode arrays in the top-rear and left-right positions. Based on this reference plan, four additional treatment plans were generated by rotating three of the four electrode arrays, all except the top electrode array, by 15$^\circ$ and 30$^\circ$ from their reference positions, resulting in a total of five treatment plans per patient. Electric field frequency was set at 200 kHz, and current density at 31 mArms/cm$^2$. The minimum and mean electric field intensities, homogeneity index (HI), and coverage index (CovI) were calculated and compared. Results: The optimal plans showed differences ranging from-0.39% to 24.20% for minimum intensity and -14.29% to 16.67% for mean intensity compared to reference plans. HI and CovI varied from 0.00% to 48.65% and 0.00% to 95.3%, respectively. The average improvements across all patients were 8.96% for minimum intensity, 5.11% for mean intensity, 15.65% for HI, and 17.84% for CovI. Conclusions: Optimizing electrode angle improves electric field therapy outcomes in GBM patients by maximizing field intensity and coverage. Keywords: electric field therapy; glioblastoma multiforme (GBM); treatment planning system (TPS); electrode array position; tumor coverage
title Effect of Electrode Array Position on Electric Field Intensity in Glioblastoma Patients Undergoing Electric Field Therapy
topic Medical Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17183